Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 6/10/12

Bias in Campaign Spending Disclosure System Makes Big Business Influence Look Smaller Than It Really Is

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 70289
Message Lee Fang
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)
Cross-posted from Republic Report


Copyrighted Image? DMCA

A Koch Industries-funded bus tour designed to elect Republicans to the House of Representatives.

Reporting campaign finance can be difficult because much of the action is obscured. Journalists have to rely on fairly unreliable government disclosure websites, many of which only report certain types of spending on an almost arbitrary schedule. To find the true number of television ads purchased in an election, one must literally visit every network station and request copies of records, a feat physically impossible for reporters with limited resources. Moreover, a vast portion of election spending, including big business-related efforts to encourage executives, employees, and others to vote for a particular candidate, is simply left off disclosures altogether.

The election this week in Wisconsin is a case in point. Media outlets were quick to report that Tom Barrett, the Democratic candidate, was outspent about 7 or 8 to 1 in campaign spending by Gov. Scott Walker and his cohorts. But this total was calculated by adding up disclosed campaign accounts in addition to television and radio spending estimated by independent analysts, like Kantar Media. This is not the whole picture.

Elections can be bought using a number of tactics that elude traditional campaign disclosure. For instance, as we reported, Americans for Prosperity, a group financed largely by Koch Industries executives Charles and David Koch, bused activists from Illinois into Wisconsin to help canvass and encourage Wisconsin voters to support Walker. Americans for Prosperity provided food and voter lists, and came prepared with a large staff of political operatives to guide these volunteers into battleground areas of the state, with one large effort conducted the weekend before the recall vote. As the Sunlight Foundation notes, the following video from Americans for Prosperity shows the group directing volunteering, overseeing phone calls to voters, and even distributing door-hangers to remind voters to support Walker:



These efforts undoubtedly boosted Walker, and were clearly designed as campaign expenditures; but because Americans for Prosperity is organized as an education charity, not a single dime of these bus tours are catalogued anywhere as election spending. In 2010, Americans for Prosperity simultaneously ran several nation-wide bus tours and get out the vote operations -- including offers of free food and gift cards to volunteers -- to help elect pro-big business Republicans to the House of Representatives. Two years after the midterm election, we discovered at least $3.9 million in unreported electioneering, mostly on the bus tours. Again, not a dime of these electioneering efforts were registered or disclosed.

Other big business fronts, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents big banks and multinational corporations, have large voter turnout efforts that are deployed every election season to get out the vote. According to Cleta Mitchell, a leading Republican attorney advising various corporate fronts, the Citizens United Supreme Court decision gives legal entities like the Chamber and Americans for Prosperity wide leeway to communicate on any issue and engage politically however they see fit -- even in terms of pressuring employees, vendors, and customers about elections. However, there is virtually no disclosure when it comes to voter mobilization (and still very few rules on more traditional electioneering, like television, radio and Internet ads).

Click Here to Read Whole Article

 

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Lee Fang Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

LEE FANG  Lee Fang is a  reporting fellow with The Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute. He covers money in politics, conservative movements and lobbying. Lee's work has resulted in multiple calls for hearings in Congress and the (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Romney Hires Voter Suppression Guru

GOP Mogul Behind Drug Rehab "Torture" Centers Is Bankrolling Opposition to Pot Legalization in Colorado

In Recorded Message To Drone Lobby Group, Congressman Rick Berg Brags About Loyalty To Industry

Revealed: Secretive Group Working To Suppress Voting In Maine Funded In Part By Wisconsin Businesses

Saudi-Led Oil Lobby Group Financed 2012 Dark Money Attack Ads

Grover Norquist's Budget Is Largely Financed by Just Two Billionaire-Backed Nonprofits

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: