Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 31 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/22/19

Bernie Sanders Wins the Foreign Policy Debate

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
(# of views)   2 comments
Author 29155
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Nichols
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

From The Nation

"I am pro-Israel, but we must treat the Palestinians with the dignity they deserve," the Vermont senator declared during the debate.

Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders
(Image by photogism)
  Details   DMCA

The Democrats had a brief but substantive foreign policy debate Wednesday night -- and Bernie Sanders gave it scope and meaning by centering Palestinian rights in a way major presidential candidates rarely do.

Joe Biden seemed ready to dominate with his "this guy has no idea what he's doing" critique of President Trump's relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and with his rumination on how North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un had said Biden should be "beaten to death with a stick."

But then Sanders got serious. He interrupted another of the former vice president's recitations of his international bona fides and turned the discussion to Biden's 2002 vote to authorize war with Iraq. In so doing, he won the debate within the debate.

"One of the big differences between the vice president and myself is he supported the terrible war in Iraq, and I helped lead the opposition against it," declared Sanders. "And not only that, I voted against the very first Gulf War as well. And I think we need a foreign policy which understands who our enemies are that we don't have to spend more money on the military than the next ten nations combined."

Responding to a question about whether he would negotiate a deal with the Taliban in order to get the United States out of Afghanistan, Sanders argued that the time has come to "rethink the entire War on Terror."

"I think it is time, after spending many trillions of dollars on these endless wars which have resulted in more dislocation and mass migrations and pain in that region, it is time to bring our troops home," said Sanders. "But unlike Trump, I will not do it through a tweet at three o'clock in the morning. I will do it working with the international community, and if it's necessary to negotiate with the Taliban, of course, we will do that."

Sanders seized every opportunity to outline foreign-policy alternatives in the fifth round of Democratic debating. Joining several of the candidates in calling out President's Trump's approach to Saudi Arabia, he declared that "Saudi Arabia is not a reliable ally." Sanders argued that the United States must promote negotiations between the Saudis and the Iranians, telling both "we are sick and tired of us spending huge amounts of money and human resources because of your conflicts."

That in itself was a strong statement, but the senator did not stop there.

"The same thing goes with Israel and the Palestinians," said Sanders. "It is no longer good enough for us to be pro-Israel, I am pro-Israel, but we must treat the Palestinians with the dignity they deserve."

That declaration drew sustained applause from the crowd at MSNBC/Washington Post Democratic primary debate in Atlanta. And rightly so, because Sanders inserted the issue into the debate.

The debate statement highlighted a position that has become a key component of the broader "new foreign policy" stance being advanced by Sanders -- who, in a November 11 essay for Jewish Currents ("How to Fight Antisemitism") wrote:

"Opposing antisemitism is a core value of progressivism. So it's very troubling to me that we are also seeing accusations of antisemitism used as a cynical political weapon against progressives. One of the most dangerous things Trump has done is to divide Americans by using false allegations of antisemitism, mostly regarding the US-Israel relationship. We should be very clear that it is not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the Israeli government."

Next Page  1  |  2


Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Nichols Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Paul Ryan? Seriously?

Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'

What the Hell Is Wrong With Paul Ryan?

The Koch Brothers, ALEC and the Savage Assault on Democracy

GM's Plant Closures Confirm the President is a Liar and a Fool

The Deafening Silence of the Republican Field in the Wake of the Planned Parenthood Shooting

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.

Comment Here:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.


Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment

Robert Cowen

Become a Fan
Author 17869
(Member since Jun 28, 2008), 2 fans, 3 articles, 200 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

If only the moderators had the courage to pick up on Bernie's comments and raise the question of Palestinian rights with the other candidates!

Submitted on Friday, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:49:48 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)

Michael Morrissey

Become a Fan
Author 12887
(Member since Mar 8, 2008), 16 fans, 34 articles, 71 quicklinks, 2430 comments, 75 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Like Mike Gravel, I wouldn't object to a Sanders/Gabbard ticket but would far prefer Gabbard/Sanders. Gabbard is a true antiwar candidate. Sanders is very weak on foreign policy, having urged "getting tough" with Russia in the last campaign and now, in the last debate, urging us to "rethink the war on terror." Gabbard says end it, and all the regime-change wars (and they are the same). That's a big difference. Sanders could easily turn into another Clinton. Gabbard is the real thing. Which is why the political apparatchiks will never allow her to win, and I doubt that Sanders would have the guts to take her as his running mate if he got the nomination. For me it's Gabbard or nobody. None of the "social(ist"programs Sanders is proposing can possibly be funded unless the militarist foreign policy is turned around, and Gabbard is the only candidate who would do this.

Submitted on Friday, Nov 22, 2019 at 6:27:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment