43 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 46 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Bernie Sanders Says He Would Take Aim at "Citizens United" as President

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ralph Lopez
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

(Image by Public domain)   Details   DMCA

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who vows to "break up the big banks," has also vowed to deploy his presidential powers, if elected, in a manner aimed at overturning the US Supreme Court ruling Citizens United. The 2010 ruling by the Roberts Court has unleashed a deluge of money from corporations and billionaires into the American political process. Sanders says he will make Citizens United a litmus test for any Supreme Court nominations he may make, writing on his issues page for "Getting Big Money Out of Politics and Restoring Democracy" that he will:

"Only appoint Supreme Court justices who will make it a priority to overturn Citizens United"

The Citizens United decision was a 5-4 decision with recently deceased Justice Antonin Scalia voting for it, making it a vote away from reversal. The average age of the Supreme Court Justices is 76, with Kennedy reaching 80 this year.

Sanders says he will deploy the power of the presidency in support of a constitutional amendment to overturn the ruling.

Sanders was one of the first to introduce a constitutional amendment to overturn the ruling after it was handed down, changing the American political landscape by equating money with speech. University of Berkeley linguist Professor Robin Lakoff likens the Supreme Court's reasoning to confusing a person's speech with the megaphone or speaker which amplifies it:

money is to speech like a megaphone or microphone: it amplifies its effectiveness, spreading it around and giving it more substance. But we would not include the microphone or megaphone used to transmit language as a part of the communication, or an aspect of its meaning. It is merely a tool that can be used to potentiate an utterance.

The Sanders amendment helped spawn a citizens' backlash against the Citizens United ruling, the largest of which is MovetoAmend.org.

One effect of Citizens United has been to spawn a class of politically active billionaires who can spend more than the parties themselves in support of, or against, any given political candidate or office holder. Sanders says at his website:

We know, for example, that the Koch brothers, the second wealthiest family in America, have made public that they and their network intend to spend at least $750 million on politics during this election. This is more money than either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party will spend.

The Citizens United ruling has been criticized by observers across the political spectrum, with the Washington Post reporting that almost as many Republicans in one set of interviews were against the ruling as Democrats.


(Image by Washington Post)   Details   DMCA

Sanders says:

Let's be honest and acknowledge what we are talking about. We are talking about a rapid movement in this country toward a political system in which a handful of very wealthy people and special interests will determine who gets elected or who does not get elected.

The fight Sanders picks with Citizens United is in tandem with the one he has advanced against "too big to fail" banks. Sanders has said, in one of his mot widely broadcast television ads, that he intends to break up these banks so that they cannot threaten the entire economy should they fail. In the same ad, he proposes free college and debt refinancing in America, to be paid for by a fraction of a percent tax on stock, bond, and derivatives trades.

Multiple recent polls have shown Sanders to be stronger than Clinton when matched head-to-head with Republican front-runner Donald Trump in the general election. Sanders beats Trump soundly outside the statistical margin of error, by six points, while Clinton enters a statistical tie.

Sanders supporters counter contentions that a socialist cannot be elected by pointing out that the US is already rife with socialism, for corporations and the wealthy. The conservative National Review calls out Trump for hypocrisy when he attacks Sanders' socialism, with Trump himself being the beneficiary of eminent domain takings and supporting corporate subsidies such as for corn ethanol, and the bank bailouts of 2008.

Sanders distances himself from the ideological socialism of his youth, saying:

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Ralph Lopez Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend