Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Banker hegemony: Pax Lemmus

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Eric Walberg       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 10/1/18

Author 20882
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)


Lemmings commit harikari too with boom-bust cycles
(Image by Eric Allie)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

So are the banksters all right after all?

Nope. All there is to show after 400 years is a kind of Pax Hamstera, or better, Pax Lemmus. The horrors of the 19th-20th centuries, now going off the horror chart in the 21st century. We run faster and faster, inventing and marketing ever new gadgets, and the standard of living, we now realize, is plummeting, not so much in dollar terms (that, yes) but in terms of all the 'external economies' that come along with those gadgets, and the lifestyle of homo hamsterus.

Keynes gave us a banker's version of the basic income -- government debt in order to stimulate demand, but to be financed based on taxation and government deficit, not on government-created money, as C.D. Douglas wanted. Bankers do not want to give up their power, and Keynes was their boy. Probably it will take another 1917 to do that, and the prospects are poor, given the fact that the bankers defeated the Bolsheviks in the end.

Reinventing the Wheel

- Advertisement -

But this is intuited by smart politicians, even if they do little to fight back.
America was created out of fiat money created by the colonists. The entire history of the US is framed by the battle over control of money. It was probably JFK's greenbacks that did him in. The much-reviled Nixon was actually the last of the FDR-inspired leaders to try to fashion a 'capitalism with a human face'. He was planning a Basic Income for the nation* (he didn't try JFK's greenbacks -- given his and Lincoln's fate). Is it possible that this and his detente with Russian and China were his real 'crimes', with Watergate a free pass to get rid of him?

In Canada, a 1974 pilot project in Manitoba under the New Democrat socialist government provided a guaranteed minimum income for all the residents of Dauphin. Good results: only new mothers and teens stopped working, the former to spend more time rearing newborns, the latter to study, showing higher test scores and lower dropout rates. There was also an increase in adults' continuing education. The period saw a reduction in rates of psychiatric hospitalization, and in the number of mental illness-related consultations.

Ontario's pilot project, started by the Liberals in 2017, in Lindsay, Hamilton-Brant and Thunder Bay, was shut down midway through its three-year trial by the Conservatives, not interested in giving capitalism a 'human face'. Before the cancellation initial results were similar, with some participants going back to school, and lots of home improvements, putting the money directly into the local economy.

- Advertisement -

How many times must we reinvent the wheel? And these experiments could have been conducted without creating any new debt, if the governments were willing to do what they have the right to do, despite the hysteria from bankers fearing they will lose their cushy scam: unearned money from creating and then 'servicing' the debt.

The economic crises, especially income distribution, unemployment and the environment, are multiplying, and they are all directly caused by our debt system, inducing obsessive 'growth' and money-based consumerism. 2008 looked like the moment when the bankers could have been lined up and shot, but instead, they got trillions in "quantitative easing" and million-dollar bonuses.

Then the Panama Papers of 2016, when offshore accounts finally were called on the carpet. Much (most?) of bank profits are whisked to these tax havens, bypassing governments, who gave the banks their money in the first place, and who use people's taxes to pay the banks for the national debt interest that are the foundation of these bank profits. Wow.

It's very hard to keep a step ahead of the banks, just as the banks must keep one step ahead of the economy, lending money to keep the economy rolling.

BI - Thin Edge of the Wedge

C.D. Douglas cut through the fog with his theory, muddled though it was, and solution: estimate the gap between current production and necessary demand, and use Basic Income to fill it. Maybe there's no need for 'growth' in the economy, or (heaven forbid) it might be better to have negative overall monetary growth. This is no longer up to the gods. The needs of the economy can be calculated.

- Advertisement -

Maybe a more demonetized life would be better, with people not bothering to work for a slave wage. How about reviving crafts, getting more education, enjoying more leisure before you're too old to enjoy it? Use social decisions-making to regulate money, not haphazard forced loans, interest-rate fiddling and recession.

Borrowing from Marx again, BI is a kind of death knell (or at least warning) that can put a stake through the capitalist beast, leading the way to government-created money and onward to socialism!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Eric writes for Al-Ahram Weekly and PressTV. He specializes in Russian and Eurasian affairs. His "Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games" and "From Postmodernism to Postsecularism: Re-emerging Islamic Civilization" are available at (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Timelines 2000-2010: US, Europe, Latin America, Africa&Asia

ISIS and the Taliban: Writing on the wall for Afghanistan

Timeline 2000-2010: Middle East

Renouncing Jewishness: Shlomo Sand and Gilad Atzmon

Euro crisis: Prison of nations

America 2018: postmodern 'Germany 1933'

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Alexander Kershaw

Become a Fan
Author 500827

(Member since Nov 25, 2014), 3 fans, 247 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Aldous Huxley was prescient. We live in a fog created by the banksters and their cohorts big oil and big industry. There is a way out without violence. They own the police and military. Public banking at the local and state level can incrementally take that power away and put it back with the public as it always should have been. The Public Banking Institute is an organization working to create public banks and it is gaining support nationwide. If the movement continues it can be successful. It will take time and effort just as women's suffrage and civil rights did. The banksters have not only impoverished the 99% but also local and state governments. Public banking will give them the ability to create money and pay for useful and necessary government services and at the same time stimulate local economies. Done properly we can have economic growth and not increase and in fact decrease pressure on the environment. For instance public banking could fund reforestation.

By the ''Hersey Bar'' standard minimum wage should be $25-$30/hr. In 1965 1 hour of work at minimum wage could buy 30 Hersey Bars or 10 NY subway rides. Other similar or worse comparisons can be made. The interest added on to all money transactions cumulatively have led to that inflation. When a credit or debit card is used interest in the form of charges to the merchant increases the cost of anything. It is hidden from the user because the user doesn't directly pay it but the fee is added to the cost of the product. Hence the inflation of Hersey Bars and subway rides. That is also why some merchants give a discount for payment in cash.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:25:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996

(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 9 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Here is an article that looks at the big favour that the Trump Administration has granted to the American banking sector:

click here

Washington failed to learn the lessons taught by the 2008 - 2009 recession and has set the economy up for another banking sector crisis that the Fed will be forced to resolve, an issue that will compromise its ability to "correct" the economy.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:41:11 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

John Peebles

Become a Fan
Author 240

(Member since Apr 3, 2006), 11 fans, 25 articles, 11 quicklinks, 480 comments, 11 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Between this insightful article and opinions being voiced by people like Max Keiser, contrarians are reaching a consensus--that the current system is approaching collapse, at least for Main Street.


80% of us are paycheck to paycheck. What more evidence of a failed economics system is there? Enough of us have awoken to the zombie system that props up financial assets with money that enters circulation at ultra-low rates (whereas we pay 20 times more.)


Winners are pre-determined. Profits are assured not from business acumen and wise decisions but rather from stock buybacks made possible by subsidized rates.


Banks like JPMorgan are cutting jobs. Why analyze markets if success requires nothing more than funding stock buybacks? Trading in and out within fractions of a second doesn't require skill, it requires algorithms. So all y'all who earn your living from the markets are losing your jobs.


Capitalism kills itself, with computerization and easy money doing the job. Marx was right and the conclusions he reached should scare those of us who worry about the inevitable boom'n'bust cycle leading to a collapse of our economic like the Great Depression, a time when alternate systems flourished out of necessity, as the central one wasn't there for them.


Money can be conjured out of nothing but this right of government as established in the Constitution has been ceded to the private Federal Reserve which has steered its money creation firehose to their cronies in the financial sector.


Money creation alone isn't enough, we need healthier Main Street economies. Should the printing press be regained by the people and their government, the value of money created by sweat equity (not debt equity) could be imperiled by inflation, so we must be cautious in whom we allow to create our money.





Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:00:18 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment