Share on Google Plus 2 Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn 1 Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

August 21st: Pontiac, MI Is Taking Their City Back From The NDAA

By       Message Aaron Nelson     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/13/14

Pontiac City Hall
(Image by Pontiac Tribune)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
br />Yesterday two local journalists from the Pontiac Tribune , Aaron Nelson and Helena Kirby, marched into City Hall and submitted a City Resolution on NDAA, which prohibits the enforcement of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act in the city of Pontiac.

We are very excited to bring you this story first.

- Advertisement -

Two years ago U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest declared that Section 1021 of the NDAA was unconstitutional because it mirrored the 1944 Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States, which let our military detain over 100,000 Japanese-American citizens without trial during World War II.

" This Court rejects the government's suggestion that American citizens can be placed in military detention indefinitely, for acts they could not predict might subject them to detention ," Judge Forrest wrote.

On August 21st, hundreds will gather at Pontiac City Hall to ask the City of Pontiac adopt the City Resolution we submitted yesterday. This is the beginning of something great. The rest is up to you.

- Advertisement -
We're confident we can Take Back Pontiac from the indefinite detention provisions found within the NDAA.

It's not okay that the military has the ability to devoid "any person" their rights under this section. One has to only commit a "belligerent" act.

What is a "belligerent act"?
Who are the "associated forces"?
What qualifies as a "hostility"?

The terms belligerent act, associated forces, and hostilities are undefined in the NDAA, leaving them wide open for interpretation in secret courts and secret laws.

This means that anyone exercising their constitutional rights by way of peaceful protests, emails or letters to representatives, can be viewed as committing "terror" activities.

This will happen without trial, without being informed of a charge, and indefinite detention pressed upon them" Secretly. You don't even need to be charged with a crime.

No trial, no lawyer or legal representation, no contact to friends and family.

- Advertisement -

With the increasing tendency of politicians to label dissenters as "terrorists", time is of the essence.

Yesterday was just the beginning of the movement in Pontiac. We are inviting all anti-NDAA advocates from across Michigan to join us at the City Council meeting on August 21st.

It's time to change the world, and we're confident this is the way to do it.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Founder of

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

August 21st: Pontiac, MI Is Taking Their City Back From The NDAA