Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Are Most Workers Satisfied With Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance? A Flawed Study Says Yes. Let's Take a Look

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   10 comments
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bernard Starr
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Really?
Really?
(Image by Bernard Starr)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

In April 2019 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was the guest speaker at the American Hospital Association conference. He fiercely attacked Medicare for All with his battle cry: "Medicare for none," to enthusiastic applause.

Although McConnell saw little need to buttress his rallying call with statistical support for this receptive audience, these days politicians and pundits who oppose Medicare for All, or any single-payer proposal, have been citing the results of a 2018 survey sponsored by America's Health Insurance Plans(AHIP). And cite it they do as received wisdom--at every available opportunity because the survey reported that 71 percent of workers are satisfied with their employer-provided health plans underwritten by private insurance companies. Opponents of Medicare for All ask, "Why then should we take away private insurance and replace it with a government-run program?"

Why indeed? But what if that 71 percent were a false figure, created by research that is scientifically unsound? If it were true that employer-provided health plans were the gold standard, then we shouldn't force employees to give them up even if it were for the greater good of supporting healthcare for the entire U.S. population.

- Advertisement -

But are employer-provided health plans the gold standard? Is it true that most people--71 percent--are satisfied with their coverage? To answer that question we must look into the credibility of the survey, which those who have taken it at face value have not done.

First, Big Red Flag: Writing in Salon on June 22, 2019, pediatrician Dr. Sanjeev Sriram, a proponent of "health justice" raised suspicion about the AHIP survey--and for good a reason. AHIP, the sponsor of the survey, is an advocacy group for the insurance industry, as stated on their website: "Advocating for the health insurance community and the consumers they serve."And Luntz Global Partners, which conducted the survey for AHIP, was founded by conservative pollster Frank Luntz, who is a Trump White House insider and a Fox News commentator. Should we then be surprised that in a statement submitted to a House Rules Committee hearing on the Medicare for all Act of 2019 AHIP took a strong oppositional stance? In fact, AHIP has a long history of promoting private health insurance. In 2009 a spokesperson for AHIP told conservative commentator Lou Dobbs on CNN that "every survey shows strong satisfaction for private health insurance." Although challenged by other reports, this was the organization's mantra in its persistent resistance to healthcare reform.

Another glaring red flag is the sample size of one thousand respondents that according to AHIP represents the 180 million Americans whose "access to healthcare and coverage comes from a partnership between employers and health insurance providers." The sample size is woefully inadequate to represent the huge diverse population of workers that includes differences in age, sex, marital status, ethnicity, education, religion, political affiliation, residency (region, urban, suburban, rural), types of employment (skilled, unskilled, office, manufacturing, technical, technology-related), and health status. Unfortunately, we don't know the makeup of the sample since AHIP has not provided that information.

- Advertisement -

Perhaps the most critical issue: How was the online survey which was conducted over four days. (January 25-28, 2018) carried out. According to the National Science Foundation, e-mail surveys are increasingly unreliable: "The future of surveys as a reliable means to measure trends is in doubt. The response rates for surveys have been declining. E-mail surveys, touted as being convenient, have shown significant sample bias and non-response problems." What was the target population that produced the 1000 who responded? How many were contacted and what was the response rate? How many completed all the questions? How many did not or submitted answers to some questions? Was there a selection process or was anyone in a general population who responded included in the sample? It's difficult to imagine that the one thousand who chose to respond to over 40 questions represented the broad demographics of the working population? Yet, detailed information about the methodology of the survey and the composition of the sample that responded was not reported, But that information is essential for evaluating the credibility of the survey.

What about the age range of the sample, which is listed as ages 18+? How much "plus" is critical. Older workers with greater medical issues are likely to have different views on healthcare satisfaction than younger workers. Punctuating this point, a 2015 survey of millennials (ages 22-37 at the time of the survey), who are notorious for avoiding doctors, showed that 91 percent avoided making medical appointments and 51 percent admitted seeing a doctor less than once a year. If you don't use medical services you are likely to say you are satisfied with your healthcare coverage--any healthcare coverage. Unfortunately, the survey report does not give the age distribution within the sample.

And what is the degree of satisfaction for those with serious medical conditions and chronic diseases that may require extensive treatments? Surely older workers would have more complex assessments of their healthcare coverage. That's why it's important for the survey to report the full age range of the sample and the numbers in each decade--not just a breakdown of responses to questions for those subjects under age 41 and above age 41.

High wage earners in the upper fifth of the wage scale are likely to be more satisfied with their employer-provided health plans than wage earners in the lower fifth since they receive as much as nine times more benefits, reports economist Ed Dolan. Obviously, it's essential to know the wage levels of the respondents in the AHIP survey to see if all wage levels were included and equally distributed. But that information is not provided.

Then there's the issue of the survey questions. Are they worded to elicit accurate information or are they stacked to get desired responses?

The main question in the survey has been widely quoted: "Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your current health insurance plan?" 71 percent said satisfied, 9 percent neither satisfied or dissatisfied and 19 percent dissatisfied.

- Advertisement -

Confounding the meaning of "satisfaction" is the response to another survey question that was not prominently reported. To the question "What is the main reason you personally do NOT feel satisfied with your current health insurance plan?" 82 percent answered, "Costs--I'm paying more and more every year but I seem to be getting less and less." How do we make sense of this? The responses to one question say 71 percent are satisfied with their employer-sponsored health plans and the responses to another question say 82 percent are dissatisfied? It's curious that AHIP's initial announcement of the findings of the survey reported the 71% satisfaction finding, which is the one the press, news anchors and commentators picked up, but not the 82% dissatisfaction finding.

For further clarification of the meaning of "satisfaction," the survey should have included questions about desired alternatives such as: "Would you prefer a plan with coverage that would remain in place if you lost your job, changed jobs, were unemployed or left to start your own business?"

The survey reported as a positive that 56 percent stay at their current jobs because of their health insurance. This may help businesses retain employees. But it's damaging for workers who may remain at an unsatisfying job out of fear of losing or changing their health insurance. It might also prevent some from taking the risk of leaving a job to start a business.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Bernard Starr Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bernard Starr, PhD, is a psychologist and professor emeritus at CUNY, Brooklyn College where he taught developmental psychology to prospective teachers and research methods and statistics in a graduate program in gerontology that he directed. (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporations Plan for Post-Middle-Class America

Mind Control: How Donald Trump Has Transformed Americans into Pavlov's Dogs

The Pandemic Disease of the 21st Century Is on the Rise

How Congress Became a 'Cathouse' of Prostitutes Paying Off Their Pimps

Reza Aslan: Why Aren't You a Jew?

Why Have Art Historians Been Silent About the Falsification of Biblical History in Artworks?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

6 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments


Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 7, 2010), 11 fans, 152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 297 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

When survey and poll results are reported, the sponsoring organizations should be required to release the methodologies and other details of the studies. Otherwise, the results should not be taken seriously.

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:18:09 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356

(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 28 fans, 2613 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

This study is ridiculous.


When you have no choice but to 'choose' your employer based for-profit insurance, how can you say you don't like it?



Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:01:59 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 7, 2010), 11 fans, 152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 297 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to 911TRUTH:   New Content

You can say you don't like it if you are presented with choices that you might prefer over the plan you are stuck with. This survey did not present those other choices.

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:54:03 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 38 fans, 70 articles, 430 quicklinks, 5604 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Let's see how I like my particular plan. It is my wife an I and we pay $540 each month for insurance premiums.

This last month my wife had a doctor's appointment and paid a $15 co-pay. During the appointment, they checked her vitals and the doctor re-prescribed her medication (which wound up costing only $8.40.

We thought we got by cheaply, but then nothing was really done as I take her vitals daily at home, but this morning we got a bill from the clinic for $175 which they said was the deductible!

That brought the total for last month to $728.40 and that is with insurance!

The problem with this for-profit health scheme is every time you go to the doctor at least three corporations have to make a profit the insurance company, the doctor, and the clinic and the only person they have to make that profit from is the sick person.

I believe anybody who says they don't want to give up their insurance does not understand the comprehensive Medicare for all which would have saved me the co-pay and deductible. I would also not have had the $540 insurance premium to pay although I would have paid it with my taxes. If my tax bill was the same as my premiums it would amount to $6,480 which I somehow feel is higher than what my tax burden will be, thus I would save money there as well. Plus Medicare stays with us whether we change jobs, can't be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions, or any other reason.

The employer loves it as the expense of having to include it as a benefit disappears, thus more profits for the company, or if they really care about their employees could raise the pay of those workers and still not affect the overall profits of the company.

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:46:07 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 
Indent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 7, 2010), 11 fans, 152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 297 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

You are correct. Insurance companies are not your friend. As comedian Rodney Dangerfield put it: "The ad says I have a friend at my local bank. Yesterday my friend came over and took my car away."

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:35:19 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2996 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Dennis Kaiser:   New Content

"...at least three corporations have to make a profit the insurance company, the doctor, and the clinic..."

I wonder if you should've included a fourth element - the employer. I wouldn't be surprised if the employers are getting some incentive from the insurers to have them host their plans.

Every time I look into this kind of stuff, the money just seems to be going all over the place. So many players in the mix, you just can't follow it anymore.

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:24:29 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 

Robert Cowen

Become a Fan
Author 17869

(Member since Jun 28, 2008), 3 fans, 3 articles, 194 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Everybody I know seems very happy when the go on Medicare, no matter what insurance they had. I had very good insurance, but Medicare is way better!

Submitted on Thursday, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:18:17 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 7, 2010), 11 fans, 152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 297 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

If you want to see an example of a legitimate scientific survey report that concisely gives all the details of the sample and methodology, check out this just released Marist survey:

yurl.com/yynraow4

Submitted on Friday, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:51:46 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 7, 2010), 11 fans, 152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 297 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content

If the short URL doesn't work try this:


http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_1907190926.pdf#page=3

Submitted on Friday, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:25:19 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Glers

Become a Fan
Author 506681

(Member since Sep 12, 2016), 20 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

One way to lower some health care costs is to get treated at Medical schools , I saved over ten thousand at the Dental school.

Submitted on Friday, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:00:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment