Serving meat in the hospital is sort of like serving Twinkies at a Weight Watchers meeting. It's counterproductive, to say the least. But at least patients at Chicago's Swedish Covenant Hospital will no longer be served meat from animals who were given antibiotics to speed their growth and keep them alive in filthy, extremely crowded conditions. The hospital is one of 300 medical facilities across the U.S. that have pledged to improve the quality and sustainability of the food that they serve, both for the health of the public and the health of the environment. For many hospitals, this includes buying antibiotic-free meats so that they won't contribute to the spread of antibiotic-resistant superbugs.
It's a positive step, but it still begs the question, "Why are hospitals serving meat in the first place?"
Antibiotic-free or not, meat is high in cholesterol and saturated fat. According to the American Dietetic Association, vegetarians are less prone to heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity than meat-eaters are. Research has shown that meat-eaters are a whopping nine times more likely to be obese than vegans are and that meat-eaters are 50 percent more likely to develop heart disease than vegetarians.
On second thought, if you're going to eat meat, you might as well be in the hospital. Doctors can just wheel you to the ER when you're ready for an angioplasty.
Seriously though, medical practitioners can better promote healthy living by encouraging people to eat meat-free meals. For one thing, plant-based foods are cholesterol-free--and they don't naturally harbor harmful bacteria such as E. coli, salmonella, campylobacter and listeria. By confining animals to cramped, feces-filled factory farms, where these disease-causing bugs flourish, farmers are only increasing the chances that more people will have to endure hospital stays.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).