Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Anti-technology movements are not without serious risk

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Group(s): ; ; , Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 512338

Unabomber Dance Party
(Image by Steve Spezz)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Across the world, in varied and often disparate subcultures, many anti-technology movements have proliferated in 2018. They are often termed Neo-Luddist political constructs, with diverse philosophies - turbocharged after the release of the Netflix series Manhunt: Unabomber. As worldwide politics becomes more polarised, our dual fears of the power of big technology firms and of economic inequality have often inadvertently split those in many fields, ranging from education, philosophy, and healthcare to the traditional news media.

"Fake news" is more than what we understand it to be currently. There are core misunderstandings around seemingly simple words and phrases, especially in the English language, across the world. This is because, especially for young people, social media has fragmented our languages. Traditional and online news-media headlines, when taken out of context, can become misunderstood depending on where they are read, the tone in which they are repeated and the political climate they are echoed throughout. Populist leaders take advantage of this, both by labelling the traditional news media "fake news" and perpetuating misinformation. Whilst linguistic misunderstandings have been present since prior to the development of agrarian society, never has our planet been so connected, and never have the misunderstandings come with such high risk.

We need to reflect on how often we are misunderstood, by analysing our core ethical and political beliefs, the words we use to express them, and what we have in common across the political spectrum. We can achieve this by engaging and analysing those who oppose our views, what their core economic concerns are, and the purpose they have for spreading misinformation. There is urgency to this kind of strategic repositioning of our politics.

Political polarisation, however, paradoxically brings opportunity where none previously existed. Those across the political spectrum can recognise two core global crises: the child mental-health crisis, and the risk of extreme far-right terrorism. By involving experts in the medical, anthropological and counterterrorism fields, these can be addressed. From my personal experience, I suspect that due to the fragmentation of the English language over social media and the dark web, that there is emotional similarity for people at risk, between the terminology of Neo-Luddist splinter movements and the extreme far right. The emotional confusion is heightened particularly in less-enfranchised younger males, who are crying out for answers, evidenced in Brazil and in the United States. The resultant tribalism, online organisation, and waves of violent crime are occurring, which will inevitably result in legislation of knee-jerk discriminatory policies across the developed world.

- Advertisement -

To counter what is clearly happening to a far greater extent elsewhere, as proposed in Victoria, Australia, a fundamental review of mental health is required, as we approach precision psychiatry. This should address compounding risk factors in political policy and social stratification with the rise of the big technology firms, resulting in careful repositioning of our strategies in regard to mental health and technology. Technology is here to stay, and all strata of society are dependent on good mental health. Both political discussion and technology, when carefully considered, can be optimally utilised in mental health by clinicians and the community, including in maintaining wellness. The political opportunities lie in focusing on the child and adolescent mental-health crisis, the necessity of economic stability, and the risks and benefits of technological skepticism, as pan-partisan constructs.

Our children and young people have never been so aware of the political climate at such young ages, and they need our reassurance that unique, even radical solutions can be found for them. By developing these novel solutions, with compassion in politics around these issues, we may begin to repair our divisions and produce a more egalitarian society.

(Article changed on November 3, 2018 at 11:33)

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Peter is a medical registrar in Melbourne, Australia, with experience and interests in Infectious Diseases and Addiction Medicine. He is currently completing a Masters of Science (Infectious Diseases) at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

One language is not enough

My name is TREO

Blame Canada!

Can cars pay attention to planets?

Anti-technology movements are not without serious risk

Preventive healthcare strategies are a matter of social justice

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment