Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Another Option for the Table: Dialogue with Pyongyang

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gene Marx       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 2/15/18

Author 37605
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)
- Advertisement -

By now most of the world has stopped caring about the panic that gripped Hawaii one Sunday last month for all of 38 minutes. The false missile alert after all was just that. No harm done. Americans even managed to settle back into their comfort zones to watch Korean American snowboarder Chloe Kim conquer the halfpipe at the PyeongChang Winter Olympics. In spite of a core message of peace and reunification an undercurrent of US and North Korean hostility continues to run below the surface. And while overtures of dialogue from both sides of the 38th parallel may have raised hopes at the Opening ceremony, harsh rhetoric could easily return when the Olympic flame is extinguished and the athletes have returned home.

OK. So where are we now?

First of all the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a nuclear state. We need to get over it. And NO nuclear state has ever unilaterally, much less voluntarily, disarmed. And the Hawaiian chaos could have easily been misread by North Korean leaders as a cover for an attack by the US military. With little or no room for error and nothing to lose at that point, officials in Pyongyang might have easily opted for an immediate counterattack based on its limited, ground-based, early-warning detection assets, setting off a spiraling thermonuclear holocaust in a worst case.

The atomic age is replete with near nuclear catastrophes, and billions of lives still hang in the balance seven decades after the Trinity detonation. In a recent article in The New Yorker, Sidney D. Drell, a groundbreaking researcher and physicist who served for nearly half a century as a top adviser to the United States government on military technology and arms control, considered it a miracle -- "so far beyond my normal optimism" -- that no other city since Nagasaki had been destroyed by a nuclear weapon. Given all the close calls and mistakes since then our species continues to exist on borrowed time.

- Advertisement -

It would seem that the time for talking, diplomatic dialogue, is long overdue.

The United States has appeared to endorse a closer post-Olympics engagement between South and North Korea with an eye to eventual US-North Korean talks, but has agreed with Seoul that sanctions must be intensified to push Pyongyang to negotiate an end to its nuclear weapons program. U.S. Vice President Pence said Washington would keep up its maximum-pressure campaign against Pyongyang, but at the same time would be open to talks without pre-conditions.

Clearly, however, insisting that North Korea disarm is a non-starter. The Kim Jong Un regime, understandably, equates survival with nuclear weaponization.

- Advertisement -

In fact believing that further sanctions and Security Council pressure will break the DPRK commitment to the bomb is a risky naivete'. With no reasonable threshold anticipated in either case, the Trump administration might well take a lesson from the Richard Nixon template of normalizing relations with a future, legitimate atomic adversary. The nuclear rise of a bellicose outlier like "Red" China in 1972 demanded resolution. A time-line of deliberate negotiations - Track 2 interactions, followed by more open discussions - arguably eliminated that nuclear stress.

A Sino-Soviet dispute, coupled with China's willingness to talk, certainly paved the way for Nixon, but that effort rewrote history. It started and concluded with dialogue, an option that should always be "on the table" but is rarely, if ever, a first consideration since war and military intervention have been the foreign-policy solutions of choice for the 21st century.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The author of this piece is Vietnam Veteran and former Naval Aviator Gene Marx. He currently serves as a member of the Veterans For Peace Membership Committee and was the past Secretary of the VFP National Board of Directors. He lives in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Way It Is

One Overreach Too Far

Good Friday Struggle on the Island of Peace

Journal Entry: Independence Day or Happy Birthday, Pop

Time to Break the Silence on Military Spending

Hate for Hate: Joystick Justice