This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
Reprinted from Ray McGovern Website
We should have seen it coming. Exactly eight years ago came a clear sign that prudence dictated a hard look into the mouth of this gift (Trojan?) horse running for President. It was Barack Obama's capitulation to NSA and the giant telecoms that should have raised our antennae higher.
As soon as Obama-the-candidate went back on his earlier promise, and said he had decided to vote, after all, for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act legislation holding the telecoms and NSA harmless for having trashed the Bill of Rights, I wrote him a letter. Neither Obama nor John Brennan, the trustee who had just become Obama's principal adviser on such issues, wrote back.
For a trip down memory lane, here's the text, originally posted on afterdowningstreet.org: See here.
* * *
Ray McGovern's Response to Obama's FISA Explanation
It's a Deal Breaker for This Intelligence Officer
Submitted by Ray McGovern on July 3, 2008 -- 11:11pm.
Dear Senator Obama,
I speak from 30 years of experience in intelligence work. I don't know who actually briefed you on the eavesdropping legislation, but the bill is unnecessary for intelligence collection and POISON for our civil liberties -- not even to mention the unconscionable retroactive immunity provision.
You have made a big mistake, Senator, in indicating you intend to vote for it. There is still time to change your mind. That's what big people do.
Your penultimate paragraph seals it for me. What you are saying relies not on principle -- and still less on respect for the law, or respect for our Constitutional rights.
What I hear you saying is an all too familiar refrain: "Tough s___, progressive voter. You know you've got nowhere else to go. You want McCain in there?"
A painful reminder that the Republicans have no corner on arrogance. You think you have us over a barrel. Well let me tell you something those suits from K Street haven't told you; you need our active support, and you are about to blow it.
Your "explanation" was unworthy of one who has sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States (including the Fourth Amendment).
And your attitude is not that of a person I THOUGHT was different -- and would be genuinely for change I could believe in.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
6
6
2
