Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter 6 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ames Straw Poll Winning Bachmann's Problem With Reality

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   51 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 5   Valuable 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 8/14/11

Become a Fan
  (304 fans)
- Advertisement -
The Tea Party has a reputation of unwillingness to compromise. But who knew that this inflexibility would extend to reality. Michele Bachmann proves, on CNN, that she's unwilling to accept reality. You can't do president without that capacity. 

Today, on State of the Union, Candy Crowley confronted Michele Bachmann with an uncomfortable reality. 
- Advertisement -
Crowley: Let me play you something you said at the debate the other day... about the debt ceiling and the downgrade. And here's what you had to say:
- Advertisement -
Bachmann says, during the debate: 
"When they dropped our credit rating, what they said was we don't have an ability to repay our debt. That's what the final word was from them. I was proved right in my position. We should not have raised the debt ceiling."
Then, Crowley read for Bachmann a quote, apparently taken from a  Politico report that "
A Standard & Poor's director said for the first time Thursday that one reason the United States lost its triple-A credit rating was that several lawmakers expressed skepticism about the serious consequences of a credit default -- a position put forth by some Republicans.
Without specifically mentioning Republicans, S&P senior director Joydeep Mukherji said the stability and effectiveness of American political institutions were undermined by the fact that "people in the political arena were even talking about a potential default," Mukherji said. 
"That a country even has such voices, albeit a minority, is something notable," he added. "This kind of rhetoric is not common amongst AAA sovereigns." 
Crowley comments, <blockquote>"They all but blame the  Tea Party and in fact, hint very broadly, that this kind of first of all, confrontation, but first of all the idea that "no compromise, no nothing" that brought the US to the brink of this, is what caused that downgrade, and you said just the opposite."</blockquote>

Bachmann replies, <blockquote> for heaven's sake, the fact that we had a debate in Washington DC about not borrowing more money that we don't have certainly isn't what brought down our triple A credit rating. It was the over-spending. To blame the debate seems absurd. That's like saying that Paul Revere caused the British invasion. It didn't happen. The real problem in all of this is the over-spending and the worry that S&P has that we might not be able to pay our debt."</blockquote>

Crowley persists, unsuccessfully in suggesting that the S&P director's words contradict Bachmann's and Bachmann goes on selling the GOP's talking points, oblivious of the REALITY that the Mukerji made it clear that it was the willingness to even discuss not raising the ceiling, an idea wholly owned by the tea party, that caused the rating drop. 

- Advertisement -

Then there's that bizarre allusion to Paul Revere. Well, the reality is that the British were already there. The S&P downgrade was probably already there, because the the Tea Party politicians had already said that they would consider allowing the US to not raise the ceiling putting it into default. 

Stories are powerful things. But Michele Bachman can't seem to tell the difference between weak, ineffective analogies, political positions and hard reality. The hard reality was that a Standard and Poor's spokesperson made it clear what the reason was and she rejected his conclusion and reasoning. 

You can't argue with a moving train and you can't argue with a reason that was given that has already led to an action that has been taken. You can disagree with the reason, but you can't dispute that the reason was the cause of the action. 


 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 5   Valuable 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. 

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity scheduled for release May 22, 2019

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

(more...)
 

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver