For months as Lebanon's historic debate over basic civil rights for Palestinian refugees has unfolded, the Obama administration has watched idly along the sidelines. As hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees cough and slow-bake while inhaling rancid camp air in Lebanon's sweltering breezeless heat, the White House has now sent Lebanon's parliament a message. The United States will not support meaningful civil, social or economic rights for the World's largest and oldest refugee population and it wants them naturalized anywhere, anyplace -- except in Palestine.
Many had been hoping that President Obama would honor in Lebanon his calls for "American-style" civil rights for Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, where daily US military actions betray American founding principles. They hoped that his administration would act to give some credence to Obama's June 2009 Cairo speech, or at least honor the pledges of Presidential envoy George Mitchell to the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah that "the United States will work without rest until the inhuman conditions of Palestinians in all the refugee camps are ended."
In fact, the Obama administration does have a dog in this historic civil rights struggle in Lebanon. Figuratively speaking, the cur is a cross between a Pit-bull-Doberman and rabid Rottweiler, and is known locally as "NABI" (Naturalization Anywhere But Israel).
The White House, and the Congressional Israeli lobby, intend that "NABI" will shepherd and corral Lebanon's Palestinians and resettle them permanently and painlessly (at least for their well-paid host countries) around the World. The further from Palestine the refugees end up the better. Perhaps as many as 100,000 Palestinians could be kept in Lebanon, even though they will be arrested if they travel south anywhere along the "blue line" or happen to rest at villages like Maron al Ras and gaze wistfully towards their former homes and villages near Akka or Safad.
The US also expects NABI to disembowel the Right of Return and has begun arranging for Arab oil cash to foot the bill for this US-Israel project. The Obama administration, colluding with Israel, is backing the gradual naturalization of the Palestinians wherever they are or can be embedded. In this context and, according to the information acquired by the Kuwait Daily, Al-Anbaa, "the State Department has formed a team of Arabs and Europeans, in order to pressure the Gulf States into financing a fund to support any country that will accept and nationalize Palestinians."
Conelly replied, "Senator, the United States is opposed to forced naturalization," implying that using cash inducements and other incentives to settle Palestinians, rather than a spring 1948 Nakba ethnic cleansing operation would be okay. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman had assured Lebanon that the US was absolutely against naturalization of Palestinians in Lebanon, but that was during the run-up to last spring's Lebanese municipal elections when many US political promises were being made in the hope of buttressing the poll prospects of the anti-Hezbollah and anti-Palestinian voters, who today are, by and large, the same politicians opposing Palestinian civil rights.
MP Michel Aoun, leader of the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah ally, (except on the issue of granting Palestinians even elementary civil rights), has been barnstorming this week warning of the US-Israeli project. On 7/26/10 Aoun declared:
"This (project to settle Palestinian refugees) is an issue that we reject, and we will not be subject to any foreign policy planning to execute certain plans. The US is not interested in assuring the security, stability and sovereignty of Lebanon, but only in solving Israel's Palestinian problem at the expense of we Lebanese."
Phalange Party leader Amin Gemayel quickly added his voice to that of his rival Aoun and expressed his fears of the Israeli-US plan to naturalize Palestinian refugees in Lebanon. He revealed in an interview with Al-Jazeera that he has information "of an Israeli plan, backed by the American side, to naturalize Palestinians through the efforts of international institutions."
Amin has no problem with scuttling the Right of Return and is in favor of naturalization as long as it does not happen In Lebanon. This is 50% of the Israeli and American position -- the only point of contention expressed by the Lebanese right wing elements is that the US and Israel have no problem with Palestinians being naturalized in Lebanon -- the NABI concept.
The Obama administration reckons that the Lebanese government can be "induced" to cooperate and social services for the remaining Palestinian refugees can be paid for by allies, including some OPEC members, even as UNRWA is to be phased out which, Israel and the US favor in the interim.
For Israel and its American proxies in Washington, UNRWA, by the simple fact of its existence, is metaphorically Edgar Allen Poe's "Tell Tale Heart" that won't stop beating and, with each ever-louder beat, reminds the world of Israel's serial international crimes. The reason UNRWA must be mauled by NABI is that Israel has long believed that by its very name, The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, UNRWA haunts people to inquire into its work and what happened in Palestine during the Nakba. Israel cannot abide the current maturing generation, especially in the West, but also in Israel, studying UNRWA's history of achievements for the Palestinians in the context of six decades of massacres, land grabs and ethnic cleansing.
The Tell Tale Heart of UNRWA must be silenced and its services assumed, at least for a few years, by Europe and the US using Arab money. The US-Israeli plan is that the naturalized refugees will be on their own wherever they end up and UNRWA can be permanently dismantled.
US Congressional sources close to Israel expect UNRWA to be abolished outright or at least financially gutted following Congressional Hearings and an Israeli lobby organized vilification campaign resurrecting the "terrorists in their ranks" and the false "anti-Semitic UNRWA textbook" paradigms of the recent past. A campaign similar to the never proven charges made by Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others at AIPAC events that leveled charges such as raising terrorists in UNRWA schools, is what is under consideration.