Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 4/12/19

America is Crossing its Rubicon

By       (Page 1 of 5 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
- Advertisement -

America is an (carbon) empire.

Venture capital-turned-polity in 1776. Like all capital, it was preordained to grow. By 1803 it made us stewards of the continent. Twenty years later, the hemisphere. Half of the remaining world in 1947 and the rest in 1991. Space back in 1983. And the world's future by 2000, thanks to assurances of an 'American Century' and our right to preemptive war. (Though it might not last a century if we do.)

For now, we sit atop the heap. So long as life still gets counted in petrodollars.

- Advertisement -

Back in 1893, as railroads were exhausting the continental market, the historian Fredrick Turner wrote a prescriptive analysis:

At the end of a hundred years of life under the Constitution, the frontier has gone, and with it the first period of American history. The people of the United States have taken their tone from the incessant expansion which has not only been open but has even been forced upon them.... He would be a rash prophet who should assert that the expansive character of American life has now entirely ceased. Movement has been its dominant fact, and, unless this training has no effect upon a people, the American energy will continually demand a wider field for its exercise.[i]

'Not only open but forced on them...' Probably not intended, Turner made a fine assessment of our democracy; a secondary exercise listed first. Five years later, when Teddy Roosevelt 'took' (his word) Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines, from Spain, democracy wasn't his motive.

- Advertisement -

But in 1904, he changed tack. The world should rent its sovereignty, rather than have us take it. In his terms: "If a country keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States." (Mind, the Philippines remained ours until 1946. Puerto Rico, though neglected, remains ours, and Cuba continues to pay dearly for its peaceful coexistence. So, nothing came off the table.)

It took until 2003 for then-proxy-president, Dick Cheney, to make clear the world would pay us to invade it, too. No rash prophet, Trump thinks now it should pay for its own prison wall.

And not least, in 1974 Nixon stipulated, whether conditionally free, or imprisoned, or bombed to dust, that it pay us in petrodollars, in effect making us the world's first carbon empire.

And what became of democracy? Arguably, the 1923 Monroe Doctrine had an anti-imperial concern for the Bolivian Revolution. Yet in 20 more years, notably while democratic revolutions were the fact of imperial Europe, it prefaced our own conquest of Mexico. Later, not coincidentally the same year Roosevelt sent out rent notices, what remained of Mexico declared war on its foreign-dealing leaders. The US sent troops to quell the insurrection but could not catch Poncho Villa. Peace in 1917 begat the world's first socialist constitution, which, unlike our liberal constitution, secured public lands, labor rights, cheap and secure credit, and ownership of natural resources.

In 1938 President Lazaro Cardenas strengthened Mexico's footing by nationalizing its oil reserves. US companies pleaded for an invasion, but Cardenas had an ally in FDR, who did not get along with the oil magnates, and did not want to push away Mexico, considering the geopolitical thrust of that era.

Over the next 3 decades, added oil revenues went to modernizing other sectors of the economy, as well as increasing education, transportation, and healthcare. Yes, as in Venezuela today, corruption was an issue. However, unlike with the preferred, neoliberal model, it's corruption because there were laws against it.

- Advertisement -

Notably, Venezuela, then, was conspicuously under-developed due to its near-complete dependence on oil revenues, which were held largely by US firms. (Even the far left, today, in blaming Chavez for the current crisis, overlooks that he was the first to substantially reinvest in other sectors of Venezuela's economy.) Mexico, with relative control of its reserves, tried to avoid that fate.

Still, a progressive constitution and some oil revenue was not equal-footing for doing business with the US. On through the '70s, when prices fell, oil reinvestments were supplemented by loans, and when oil prices fell starkly in the later years, Mexico submerged, but primarily because in 1979 the US devalued the peso. By 1982 Mexico couldn't scrounge the rent and the US and its World Bank and IMF vivisectors carved slices out of Mexico.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

JAMES MUNSON Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Writer, activist, some-times artist and musician, all-times dad. Pissed and saying so in Portland, OR.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Will Lead Us Out of the Capitalocene?

Is AI Just Rearguard Capitalism?

America is Crossing its Rubicon

Moderates Are a Ruling-Class Fiction

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.

Comment Here:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments  Post Comment


Become a Fan
Author 513321

(Member since Apr 11, 2019), 1 articles, 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

America will do to Venezuela what it did to Mexico. America crippled Venezuela's economy so it could import oil to Venezuela.

Submitted on Friday, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:07:11 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment