AIPAC: ISRAELS AGENT FEELING SQUEEZED?
The American Israel public affairs committee (AIPAC) has seen headier days according to US congressional staffers forced to work regularly with the pro-Zionist agent of Israel. The grip of fear and the lock on Congress that the Israel first organization has long touted in its service to Israel may be weakening against a backdrop of American Jews rejecting the increasing rants of Prime Minister Netanyahu that are driving many Jews to distance themselves from him, from AIPAC, from other Arabphobic US Zionist organizations, and from Israel.
AIPAC tells some Congressional aids that fund raising is hurting and it can't keep promises it made to certain candidates that it would arrange "indirect" funding for their current election campaigns. Netanyahu is increasing becoming the butt of jokes across the Israeli and American political spectrum. Several in his cabinet and the US Congress reportedly view him as an embarrassment. A perception likely added to by his recent General Assembly cartoon gimmick and his repeated Nazi style arm and hand gestures that were widely distributed by the main stream American media outlets especially Reuters, AP and even the Zionist Drudge Report.
In addition, there are signs that some members of congress and their staffs, who are heavily lobbied by AIPAC to donate, are beginning to chaff at heavy handed AIPAC fundraising tactics.
Perhaps reflecting financial pressures on its free spending policies including astronomical administration costs, on 9/24/12, Jonathan Missner, AIPAC's Director of National Affairs and Development sent out more 500,000 emails in a desperate and thinly veiled bid to raise cash to defeat Obama.
- Protestors in multiple Arab countries storm U.S. embassies, burn American and Israeli flags, and chant "death to America, death to Israel," amidst false reports that a video was created by an Israeli Jew and backed by 100 Jewish financiers.
- Iran sent military personnel and large quantities of weapons across to Syria to aid the Assad regime's violent crackdown.
- A deadly terror attack along the Egypt-Israel border that killed 16 Egyptians and enabled terrorists to penetrate into Israel.
- Leaders in Iran and its regional proxies increased their vitriol against Israel. The frequency and intensity of these recent statements has been troubling: "Anyone who loves freedom and justice must strive for the annihilation of the Zionist regime." Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (August 17th).
- If you're like most pro-Israel Americans, these events have made you more scared for Israel's existence than you've likely felt in many years.
- But as you watch these dangers continue to unfold, it is important to remember there is something you can do to help keep Israel safe.
- You can join AIPAC, and help ensure that our leaders in Washington speak out clearly and unequivocally in support of Israel and that the aggressions shown toward our greatest ally Israel must immediately cease.
- At this dangerous time, the number one strategic answer to the threats facing Israel is for America to express -- in every possible way- an unwavering, unshakable commitment to Israel.
- We must ensure that President Obama speaks out for Israel.
- We must ensure that America stands by its full commitment to Israel's security assistance for fiscal year 2013, which is vital for Israel to be able to defend herself.
- And we must ensure that America continues to pledge 100% of its diplomatic support to Israel.
- We must do all of this, so that we can send a strong and loud message that America stands by Israel and that any attacks on Israel's security is an attack on America's security."
AIPAC appears to be failing in carrying orders from the Israeli Embassy in Washington "to defeat Obama, whatever is required." The latest polls, including two commissioned by the American Jewish Committee and one from the Anti-Defamation League shows Obama likely avoiding the defeat on November 6th that Tel Aviv hoped his combative attitude toward Israel would produce. Obama currently leads Mitt Romney by a 69-20 percent margin among likely Jewish voters.
If these polls hold, while they represent a marked decline from the 78 percent of the Jewish vote Obama got in 2008, they show Romney's promise to put Israel "first no matter what " is not resonating with American Jews. By now even garnering 25% of the Jewish vote this shows there is plenty of resistance to Romney on a variety of domestic social issues that increasingly among the American public matter more that Israel's zany schemes.
The poll projections may have been reflected at the UN last week when Netanyahu appeared to back off a bit from his pillorying of the Obama administration as being weak on terrorism.
Meanwhile, according to an Arab American Institute poll, 52 percent of all Arab-Americans say they plan to vote for Obama, compared to 28 percent who have declared their support for Romney. Broken down by religion, Arab American Muslims support Obama overwhelmingly (75% to 8%), while Orthodox/Protestants support Romney by a 16% margin. According to the poll, Arab American Democrats outnumber Republicans by a 2-1 margin (46% to 22%), continuing a steady migration away from the GOP toward the Democratic Party since 2002.
Congressional staffers report that the Obama White House is rejecting the tactics being employed behind its back to assert pressure for the "red lines" that Netanyahu's has been pushing and is aware that AIPAC is actively working to defeat President Obama on November 6th.
What is confusing much of the American Jewish community appears to be the same as what perplexes a growing segment of the non-Jewish American public. And that is Netanyahu's nonsense over Iranian progress in having nuclear weapons and the history of this "the sky is falling-we must cry wolf!" canard. It was back in April of 1984, that the British defense magazine Jane's Defense Weekly got things started with its false claim that Iran was "engaged in the production of an atomic bomb, likely to be ready within two years."
Jane's became embarrassed since it could offer no proof to back its sensationalist claim and soon admitted that its speculation was based on a West German intelligence source which turned out to be an assistant engineer who visited the unfinished Bushehr nuclear reactor that year and became curious. Soon, a pillar of the US Zionist US Senator Alan Cranston's lobby picked up on the report and declared that Iran would have nuclear weapons by 1991.
The next year, Benjamin Netanyahu, a onetime campaign volunteer for Cranston, now an Israeli parliamentarian, began a campaign to inform the World that Iran could develop nuclear weapons within "three to five years" and therefore must be stopped through "an international front headed by the US."
The current President of Israel Shimon Peres announced in 1992 that Iran would have nuclear weapons by 1999. As noted by Robert Fisk in the UK Independent, current Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said in 1996 that Iran would have a nuclear arsenal by 2004.
Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld joined the project and reported to Congress in 1998 that Iran could build an intercontinental ballistic missile with a nuclear or a biological payload that could hit the US within five years. Secretary of State Colin Powell soon claimed in 2004 that if fact, Iran had been working on technology to fit a nuclear warhead onto a missile. These allegations boldly came from Powell's less than one year after his Iraqi weapons of mass destruction assertions were being proven to be false.
For his part, Netanyahu reportedly got into an ugly argument with the American ambassador to Israel last month over the Obama administration's unwillingness to take matters regarding Iran to a more aggressive level. The Israeli prime minister was, according to the New York Times, "at his wit's end" because, he claimed, Iran was "only four to six weeks away from a nuclear bomb". A few weeks later, Netanyahu backtracked and pushed the deadline "to six or seven months away."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).