Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 8/12/18

After-dinner thoughts on "WHAT IS TRUE? HOW CAN WE KNOW?"

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 509442
Message Em Sos
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Josh Mitteldorf's stated thesis is: "The purpose of this article is to propose a loose research consortium, a forum within which we might share sources, explain why we believe what we believe, and change one another's minds."

How then is one, more broadly, to comprehend and conceive the depth and extent of the main proposition when it has been oversimplified and narrowly construed, by a majority of respondents, as basically relating to a single issue, namely 9/11?

From this observational perspective, it is deduced that the evil goals of the Shadow Government/Deep State/Illuminati/Hidden Hand - whatever choice of terminology is applied, is so self-serving and hence malevolent that the tactics of their strategy of 'divide and rule' are unconsciously avoided by the majority of the population. The all-encompassing longer-term deleterious effects of which will be devastating, only those with eyes wide open, will acknowledge and be somewhat more prepared to face.

That people are unwilling, incapable even, to permit themselves to see the big picture of what is in front of their eyes, let alone to confront the prospects of the dire consequences for humanity that lie ahead, is obvious, yet bewildering.

Cutting through the subterfuge, keeping populations divided from each other and confused by the multiplicity of diversionary manufactured stories they present is the intent.

This idea dates much further back in time than 9/11 or any other "day of infamy" in the broader history of societies' 'civilizing' over time.

One would think that consciously taking a decision to walk away from a belief, say, for example, in a one-deity belief system and then, after some years of contemplation and reflection to take up an opposing blind faith belief, tells this writer that there is no such thing as objective truth; at least not where it involves the subjective human heart and mind.

What is an Operant? According to a Wikipedia explanation of the term, an operant involves modifying behavior by the reinforcing or inhibiting effects of its own consequences. They are justified by the stories we tell ourselves about our own behaviors. Instrumental conditioning is a learning process in which behavior is modified by the reinforcing or inhibiting effects of the resulting consequences. (Lifetime individual existential exposures to experiences).

Permitting myself to think outside of the box of acceptable parameters, I see that one possible truth is that we are all merely aspects of one universal consciousness, biologically, yet diversely personified, each individual endowed with her/his own idiosyncrasies. Each individual evolves through a set of unique experiences and inculcations over time.

Surely, in this fleeting moment of historical space and time, our 'bigger picture' view should no longer narrowly focus on simplistic, single issue, 'Identity Politics', the resultant outcome of centuries of successful application of the enforcement techniques of "divide and rule" policies.

As individuals, we need to be more critical, in general, and deeper thinking than what we have been to date. Subjectively questioning our individual narratives of what a particular objective truth may be is one thing; questioning what is the universal truth, metaphysically, is vastly more inaccessible. For example, one aspect of metaphysics involves institutional scientific research, which seeks to answer, in a "suitably abstract and fully general manner", the questions beyond our everyday immediate ken.

Does the individual mind, in fact, even possess the capacity to comprehensively conceive it all, beyond her/his own existence? Isn't this today the basic intent of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) proselytizers?

Permit yourself the time to look at this 1992 CNN video interview, with William (Bill) Cooper, author of Behold A Pale Horse, in its entirety, and with open-minded perspicacity.

His untimely demise, by gunshot, in November 2001, two months after 9/11, is not unprecedented. Given what is beginning to come to light since, and is gradually being disseminated, speaks volumes for his credibility as one capable of getting at the truth.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Em Sos Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Free thinking, animate, global subject, as competent as the next humane being, to dialogue on the matter of our species continued survival on mother Earth.

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Which United States Are We Talking About?

The Greatest Lies Ever Told

Mike Whitney's Tom Friedman Paean to a Saudi Tyrant

If Only They Will See: First-Hand Factual Histories' Observations Are Ample Enough Reference.

For 400 Years, Talking and Talking... and Talking

Supremacist Mindset is As Old As White Settlement of the United States Itself

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: