Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

After The Elections, Leave JASTA Alone

By       Message Jon Gold       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   6 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 10069
- Advertisement -

10/8/2016

On the 27th and 28th of September, both the Senate and the House voted to override President Obama's veto of JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors Of Terrorism Act).

CSPAN Image Of Veto Override
CSPAN Image Of Veto Override
(Image by Jon Gold)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Before JASTA was passed into law, we heard about why it shouldn't pass from the White House, and from Saudi Arabia.

- Advertisement -
After the Senate voted to override the veto, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest called it "the single most embarrassing thing the United States Senate has done possibly since 1983."

Jerrold Nadler did an excellent job debunking the "imagined fears" about JASTA.

Since the veto has been overridden, the chorus against JASTA seems to have grown. On 9/29/2016, CNN reported that "top congressional leaders from each party expressed buyer's remorse Thursday about a controversial new law that was enacted over President Barack Obama's objections that allows 9/11 families to sue Saudi Arabia. Just one day after these lawmakers led the first override of a veto during Obama's presidency they publicly called for making changes to the law."

- Advertisement -
Now, the Hill has reported that "Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said that he spoke to Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir last week, according to Bloomberg, and the Saudis are open to tweaking the law with new legislation following the November elections (I don't know about you, but the idea of a foreign entity having the ability to get a law "tweaked" doesn't seem right to me).

On 10/6/2016, Treasury Secretary Lew told (39:00) the partially Saudi-funded Peterson Institute for International Economics that JASTA is bad, and he put forward all of the debunked talking points.

The Congress has had seven years to look over JASTA, to change JASTA, to compromise on JASTA. If they had a problem with it, they should have said so before voting for it. Before overriding the veto.

If after the elections, individuals attempt to "tweak" the bill to take some of the teeth out of the legislation, then they would be treasonous in my book.

The families have had to wait 15 years just to get the chance to bring 9/11 into a court room. They've had to fight, and fight, and fight, and fight. Don't take that chance away from them. Don't you dare.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I'm a resident of Pennsylvania, on the outskirts of Philadelphia. I've been a web designer/web developer for a little over 11 years now. My hobbies include watching movies, playing video games, reading comic books, and drumming. For the last 9 (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Can't Point A Finger At Saudi Arabia, And Not Have 5 Fingers Pointing Back To The U.S.

Further Proof 9/11 Needs A Real Investigation

The Facts Speak For Themselves

Dianne Feinstein 911 NSA Narrative Doesn't Cut It

Dom Giordano Mocks Effort To Help 9/11 Families And 9/11 First Responders