Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/10/10

Afghanistan's troubles far from over

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Drug production: Ignored by government, funding our enemies
(Originally in the Washington Times)

By Robert Weiner and Jonathan Battaglia

Former Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld's policy of ignoring the rampant opium-heroin trade in Afghanistan has carried over. Neither president - Afghanistan's nor our own - mentioned the opium epidemic that is ravaging Afghanistan during a joint news conference at the White House last month, and none of the congressional leaders - majority or minority, House or Senate - included the drug issue in statements during Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai's Capitol Hill visits. They have forgotten the elephant in the room.

There couldn't be a bigger mistake. Afghanistan is the No. 1 producer of opium and heroin in the world. Profits from the drugs are a major part of the funding for al Qaeda and the Taliban - Sen. Charles Schumer, New York Democrat, has calculated it's as much as 70 percent of the insurgents' money. If Osama bin Laden is alive, drug money is protecting him, feeding him and providing the resources for him to reach far beyond his current hiding place. We know that the warlords in the profitable drug-growing districts of Afghanistan are harboring and funding al Qaeda's leaders.

Afghan and American leaders have embraced an ambivalent policy toward a cash crop that is being used against their goals. At a May 27 news conference, President Obama restated that he is executing a new strategy in Afghanistan - this is his chance to do more than continue the old one. Mr. Obama should take the reins from Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on the drug issue.

The military has never wanted to be involved in overseas counterdrug operations; it does not perceive that as its mission. The laws say such assistance is fully appropriate and, if against an enemy, even more so. Department of Defense strategists believe it is better to let opium production run wild in Afghanistan in order not to disrupt the economy. Their tactic has been an ineffective "top down" intelligence operation supposedly going after the financiers. Though that's a worthy goal and important if it works, success is impossible to gauge. Fewer drug fields, however, are quantifiable, and visible from the air and ground.

In contrast, American leaders are carefully watching the drug problems south of the U.S. border. Drug trafficking was a priority mentioned by both Presidents Obama and Felipe Calderon at their U.S.-Mexico White House news conference a week after the U.S.-Afghanistan event. The United States has pledged to pay the Mexican government $1.1 billion to help fight its drug war. Mexico eradicates more drugs than any nation on earth. Apparently, the strategies are different because the U.S. military is not massively engaged in Mexico - whereas it is in Afghanistan.

One question mark is Mr. Karzai's half brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, accused of being a powerful figure in the drug trade. Mr. Karzai himself threatened (or made a bad joke) in March that he would join the Taliban if the United States and its allies continued to pressure him to do more to end corruption.

For American forces to make Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan, through which a third of the drugs transit, no threat to our national security, we must first cut the illegal livelihood that funds the terror groups out to get us and not turn a blind eye to the problem. Should we not be more concerned about U.S. national security than the happiness of the Afghan farmer? The reason we are there, after all, is not to help the farmers, but to slice the al Qaeda threat.

Former U.S. drug czar Gen. Barry McCaffrey agrees: "The war will be won when the international community demands the eradication of the opium and cannabis crops and robustly supports the development of alternative economic activity."

Gen. McCaffrey's second point is happening: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has provided Afghan farmers with seed, fertilizers and irrigation facilities so they are not forced to grow opium to feed their families. But economic assistance will fail if we do not eradicate the drugs. We'll face more Christmas airline attacks and Times Square bombers. Farmers make at least four times as much from opium as they do from other crops.

If Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal wants to be successful in Afghanistan, he must take a strong stand against a narco-economy that is funding the enemy. Don't wait for the Afghans or the British to do it - they won't. For a U.S. military that has never been enthusiastic about drug eradication, this could be a tall order - one that could only be given by the commander in chief.

Robert Weiner was director of public affairs for the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy from 1995 to 2001. Jonathan Battaglia is a policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates.

Link to original:

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Bad money vs. bad money -- how Denver ballot measure could be blueprint for getting money out of politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend