Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

ACLU, EFF Release Details on Motions Related to Their Fight Against a DOJ Twitter Order

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Kevin Gosztola     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/9/11

Author 7416
Become a Fan
  (66 fans)

Follow me -- But not like that DOJ
(Image by
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
br />Follow me -- But not like that DOJ by

Post originally appeared on

- Advertisement -
News broke last night on February 8 as a court unsealed three motions filed on behalf of Icelandic parliamentarian Birgitta Jonsdottir by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) last month. The motions were filed in response to the U.S. government's targeting of Twitter accounts as part of an investigation related to WikiLeaks.

Additionally, it was reported that a grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia will be held on February 15 on whether there is legal justification for the Justice Department to request Twitter account details and whether the Justice Department order for Twitter turn over account information should be kept under seal.

Federal prosecutors are and have been seeking to obtain information on Icelandic parliamentarian Birgitta Jonsdottir, Dutch hacker and entrepreneur Roy Gonggrijp and US computer programmer and known WikiLeaks volunteer Jacob Appelbaum as well as "subscriber account information" for Bradley Manning, who has been charged with leaking classified information, and WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange.

The ACLU's "Motion to Seal" suggests there is a "presumption of access to judicial records like the sealed documents under both the common law and the First Amendment. It asserts the government cannot overcome the "presumption because: (1) the "Movants" (Jonsdottir, Gonggrijp, Appelbaum) have been made aware of the investigation and the "Twitter Order" (2) the "Movants" have an "immense public interest in learning about the government's attempts to obtain their records so that they can take steps to protect their constitutional rights" and (3) the sealed materials are of "immense public interest to the ongoing debate about the legality of WikiLeaks' publication of previously unpublished information concerning the US government's activities."

- Advertisement -
The "Motion to Seal" highlights how "Movants routinely use the Internet for self-expression, publication, association and communication," have "multiple electronic communications accounts, with various technology companies that offer opportunities to communicate with others, and since the "Twitter Order requires Twitter to provide the government with information regarding the identity of anyone with whom Movants have sent or received private DMS, including those individuals' email addresses and their IP addresses," documents should be unsealed.

The "Motion of Real Parties in Interest Jacob Appelbaum, Birgitta Jonsdottir, and Rop Gonggrijp to Vacate December 14, 2010 Order" -- to overturn the order requiring Twitter to turn over private records -- outlines the following: the application does not provide "specific and articulable facts" to indicate the Twitter information is "relevant" and "material" to the investigation of WikiLeaks; the order intrudes on First Amendment rights; the order threatens "Fourth Amendment rights because disclosure could reveal that the Parties were located in particular private spaces at particular times"; the Order calls for "warrantless disclosure"; and finally, demand for Jonsdottir's information is "contrary to Icelandic law."
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Kevin Gosztola is managing editor of Shadowproof Press. He also produces and co-hosts the weekly podcast, "Unauthorized Disclosure." He was an editor for

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?