Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 19 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts    H1'ed 11/27/19

A World on Fire: The Establishment's Counter-Revolution against Democracy

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (# of views)   9 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Mike Rivage-Seul
Become a Fan
  (44 fans)


(Image by sheepiety.com)   Details   DMCA

On November 21st, conservative pundit, David Brooks published a confusing op-ed in the New York Times entitled "The Revolt against Populism." At least for this reader, it generated an overwhelming sense of information entanglement and of confusion about making sense of the world Brooks described.

I'm referring on the one hand to the welter of detail supplied in his enumeration of countries supposedly rebelling against populism. (How is one to know enough to make sense of all of that?) On the other hand, my reference is to Brooks' all-encompassing use of the term "populism." For him everyone from Xi Jinping to Donald Trump seems to fit into that category. How is that possible?

The purpose of this reflection is first of all to answer that question: how to make sense of the term "populism." Its second purpose is to use that clarified term to offer a brief framework explaining the current worldwide rebellion unfolding before our eyes.

Begin with that last point, the rebellion that Brooks describes as a revolt against populism. It's everywhere. As the author notes, demonstrations and street riots have erupted in Hong Kong, Warsaw, Budapest, Istanbul and Moscow. Angry masses are currently protesting in Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. Similar phenomena surface in Latin America's "Pink Tide," particularly in Venezuela, Ecuador, Mexico, and Bolivia. Brooks also includes the "Yellow Vests" in France, Brexit in Great Britain, and Trumpism in the United States.

He might well have added venues like Algiers, Argentina, Egypt, Haiti, Puerto Rico, and Iraq. And then, of course, there are the permanent populist revolts entrenched in China (comprising 20% of the world's population) and Cuba not to mention ISIS and al-Qaeda. Finally, Brooks might also have included populist rebellion against climate change in our own country e.g. Standing Rock, Extinction Rebellion, the Sunrise Movement, and School Strikes inspired by Greta Thunberg.

Yes, Brooks is right: the world is in flames; it's "unsteady and ready to blow."

And what's the cause of it all? Brooks gives two answers. For one, it's a revolt against the revived and globalized form of laissez-faire capitalism that emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union 30 years ago. In the aftermath, with the Soviet Union in ruins, capitalist ideologues like Francis Fukuyama hastily declared the end of history and their own particular system definitively triumphant. As Margaret Thatcher put it there was no alternative.

However, far from being generally beneficial and inevitable, the emergent system of world-wide privatization, deregulated markets, and tax cuts for the rich alienated the masses. They experienced globalism as favoring a relatively small number of elites, while adversely impacting wage workers, rural populations and emerging middle classes. Neoliberalism proved to be culturally destructive as well.

In response to its austerity programs for the non-elite, people everywhere gravitated to populism. That's the second explanation of the world's turmoil identified by Brooks -- a populism so ineffective that people are rebelling everywhere.

But it's here that his deeper confusion appears. It comes from the author's mixture of the term's democratic meaning with neoliberalism's undemocratic reaction precisely to that popular thrust. It comes from his refusal to face facts. In personal terms, Evo Morales Movement towards Socialism (MAS) represents a hugely effective populism; Donald Trump and the U.S. government are anti-populist.

To get what I mean, first of all consider the definition of populism itself. Wikipedia defines the term as "a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups."

Of course (using Maslow's hierarchy), the primary concerns of the people everywhere are always the same: food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, education, dignified work, and just wages. Once those needs have been met, secondary concerns emerge such as freedom of religion, of press, and the rights to assemble and protest. According to that understanding, you might just as well define populism as democracy, and the title of Brooks' article as "The Revolt against Democracy."

Contrary to the impression conveyed by Brooks, that revolt is primarily embodied precisely in his beloved Establishment's invariable reaction to the democratic aspirations just listed. It's always the same: sanctions, regime change, coup d'e'tats, assassinations, and outright war waged by proxy or by direct attack. Popular support for such anti-democratic tactics (insofar as they are even sought) is achieved by appealing to the economic self-interest of the elite and to the primal prejudices of "the base."

Favorite reactionary anti-democratic themes invoke patriotism, religion, racism, homophobia, sexism, and xenophobia. Meanwhile, the genuine causes of popular misery including unaffordable rents, inadequate wages, inescapable debt, widening gaps between rich and poor, privatized healthcare and education, a tattered social safety net, decaying or non-existent public transportation, ubiquitous political corruption, and endless war are left unaddressed. To call such austerity measures "popular" simply muddies the waters making it more difficult to make sense of the world. And yet this is what Brooks and standard treatments of "populism" constantly imply and say.

Such sleight of hand enables mainstream pundits like David Brooks to falsely equate "populisms of the left" and "populisms of the right." In the process, it empowers them to admit the failures of neoliberal capitalism, but to hastily add that leftwing populism is no better. As Brooks puts it: "But it's also clear that when in power the populists can't deliver goods. So now across the globe we're seeing "a revolt against the populists themselves." After all, Brooks claims, "Venezuela is an economic disaster" and in Bolivia "Evo Morales stands accused of trying to rig an election."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Supported 4  
Rate It | View Ratings

Mike Rivage-Seul Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Mike Rivage-Seul is a liberation theologian and former Roman Catholic priest. Retired in 2014, he taught at Berea College in Kentucky for 40 years where he directed Berea's Peace and Social Justice Studies Program.Mike blogs (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sunday Homily: Pope Francis to Women: The Next Pope Should Be One of You!

The Case for and Intimate Relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene

"Cloud Atlas": A Film for the Ages (But perhaps not for ours)

Muhammad as Liberationist Prophet (Pt. 2 of 4 on Islam as Liberation Theology)

What You Don't Know About Cuba Tells You About YOUR Future

Sunday Homily: Pope Francis' New Song -- Seven Things You May Have Missed in 'The Joy of the Gospel'

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

5 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments  Post Comment


Mike Rivage-Seul

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 9, 2010), 44 fans, 280 articles, 986 comments, 3 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It's a huge mistake for progressives to allow the terms of debate to be dictated by the likes of David Brooks and the NYT.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:00:02 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (7+)
Help
Indent

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784
(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 42 fans, 1 articles, 15 quicklinks, 5425 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Mike Rivage-Seul:   New Content

Great article. I think progressives in solidarity with the oppressed around the world need to recognize the out-sized role the corporate owned and in some cases "public" financed media organizations play in confusing the public about the causes of political turmoil. They are the official gate keepers of the ruling oligarchy. Without being able to control the narrative, their empire would crumble. That's why they work so hard at shutting down independent press. Caitlin Johnstone writes eloquently about this all the time as I'm sure you know.

If we are going to dismantle this cruel and unsustainable system, we need to start by exposing how sinister is this propaganda system.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:36:53 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (7+)
Help
IndentIndent

Mike Rivage-Seul

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 9, 2010), 44 fans, 280 articles, 986 comments, 3 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

Thanks, Lois. I wish I had also referenced this week's anniversary of the Battle of Seattle. Vandana Shiva sees the current world turmoil as a continuation of that great act of resistance. Caitlin Johnstone is great.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:54:45 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (6+)
Help

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
Author 24101
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 15 fans, 6 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2112 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It is clear to me that the US mainstream media has become Orwell's "Ministry of Truth." We are awash in nonstop propaganda designed to hide the meaning of everything. As past CIA director Casey said, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

Look at our militarized police, look at Assauge, Manning, Blumenthal, and the war on journalism, look at Snowden's revelations about ubiquitous Big Brother surveillance, and see that we are clearly a fascist oligarchy, not a democracy. All our regime change wars are wars to install fascist oligarchs. Calling our actions democracy is sickly laughable.

We have to back away from our capitalist oligarchy If we do, they will dissolve like a water drenched wicked witch of the west. Do it with your pocketbook. Do not buy supplemental insurance to medicare! It ensures a place for the leaches in any future medical plan. Do not buy $mas crap. Make something out of our vast, never ending supply of waste. Act like you want the earth to be here for your kids.

My life has improved as I move away from tech, processed foods and fad crap. There is a lot to be done for today and any possible future by simplifying one's own life and not giving money to the oligarchs, i.e. Amazon, Walmart, Tesla, etc.


Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 6:19:11 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (4+)
Help
Indent

Mike Rivage-Seul

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 9, 2010), 44 fans, 280 articles, 986 comments, 3 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

Chuck, you are a model for us all. Thanks for calling us to account. This Thanksgiving, I'm hoping my family will discuss ideas like the ones you share here. Thanks again.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 6:31:40 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Help

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374
(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 21 fans, 3 articles, 1408 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Great article, Mike!!

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:12:25 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

Mike Rivage-Seul

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 9, 2010), 44 fans, 280 articles, 986 comments, 3 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Lawrence Ré:   New Content

Thanks, John.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:19:25 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Help

Liam Watt

Become a Fan
Author 88883
(Member since Jul 12, 2013), 2 fans, 71 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Two part epoxy: 1) Double Speak. 2) Repeat a lie so often it becomes accepted as fact (as in Russia-gate). This glues the minds of supposedly educated, professional class voters to continuing support of the status quo death trip pretending to be "our democracy". We so have our work cut out for us.

Submitted on Wednesday, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:36:34 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (4+)
Help
Indent

Mike Rivage-Seul

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 9, 2010), 44 fans, 280 articles, 986 comments, 3 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Liam Watt:   New Content

So much b.s. to cut through -- just to prevent losing our souls.

Submitted on Thursday, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:47:49 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment