Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 11/23/18

A Western Speculative Reflection of the Self

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   6 comments
Author 509442
Message Em Sos
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Question: Will Visceral Disapproval of Religion Generate Any 'Likes' When Forthrightly Spoken Out Loud?

Institutional religion, for all the good it does in reality; its 'intents and purposes' is supposedly to allay man's innate fears of the unknowable, unknown, while at the same time, its master stroke lies in the fact that it has been the most successful, yet harshest instrumental means of control of the subliminal heart and soul.

It has, at the same moment also, ipso facto, been highly divisive of the universality of being, itself.

It is at the root of biases and hatreds, amongst humanity. It created and infused imaginary divisions in the subconscious human mind; and separated, by severing the oneness of all, into chronic trepidation's about the 'Others'.

The differing symbols of religions are just that, simply expressed representations of the same comprehensive inner voice of the universal human soul and spirit.

There is one certainty about all aspects of individual life, and that is its finiteness. It will eventually end all ideations of particular exceptionalisms, for it will cease for all, in perfect harmony.

This fact is one of the intractable, unknowable, unknowns, for it is usually more towards the end of the journey, that it renders us, one and all, the same; too late to act less odiously towards each other.

The nature of the human animal is that it thinks. It has the capacity for expression of a subliminal conscious thought process, and with this apparently unique ability, is capable of self-reflection - if only disingenuously so; of regarding itself and its specific circumstances as markedly different from all else; as separate, unique individual entities, somewhat elevated, and therefore, not part and parcel of the same 'lowly' herd of animate life.

A herd, by definition, is a group of instinctive followers, and humans certainly are not apt to regard themselves simply as a blind herd of followers.

With this presumption: "I think, therefore, I am", 'I' thinks this entitles me to regard myself as special, separate from all 'Others', but at the same time leaves me incapable of recognizing that this is fallacious reasoning.

All individual human striving accomplishes is the attempt to separate the self from the herd; to stand out, in its own mind, as worthier of not having to -- abide by the overriding law of nature. And thereby, simply not having to perish!

The mistaken, blind faith belief is that the mere symbols accrued, the greater the protective power one has against physical demise.

This insecurity is especially apparent in Americans' constant need to express aggression.

For only a local passive expression of these delusions, and underlying aggressive tendencies: In the end, "the one, with the most toys, wins."

Institutional religions are a balm - a salve, a creative figment, a misapplication of the facility for critical thinking, when contemplating other realities - specifically for their adherent's exceptional and sole personal protection.

This consciousness of a separate self is both a great endowment, as well as in the same instant, a great shortcoming; the irreconcilable dichotomy.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Em Sos Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Free thinking, animate, global subject, as competent as the next humane being, to dialogue on the matter of our species continued survival on mother Earth.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Which United States Are We Talking About?

The Greatest Lies Ever Told

Mike Whitney's Tom Friedman Paean to a Saudi Tyrant

If Only They Will See: First-Hand Factual Histories' Observations Are Ample Enough Reference.

Supremacist Mindset is As Old As White Settlement of the United States Itself

For 400 Years, Talking and Talking... and Talking

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: