Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 29 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

A San Francisco Every Month: How China's Urbanization Pays for Itself

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages)   3 comments
Message Godfree Roberts

Republished from The Greanville Post


The strength of a nation derives from the integrity of the home.
Confucius, Analects.

(Image by TGP website (Wharton edu))   Details   DMCA

San Franciscans unable to afford the $3,600 monthly rental for a one bedroom apartment sleep in the streets and, like most world cities Beijing recently faced a similar problem. Twenty-three million prosperous Beijingers wanted meals from local restaurants but the quarter-million migrant workers who delivered them could not afford the city's eye-watering rents.

Resourcefully, they found neighborhoods condemned for renewal, hooked up illegal wiring to leaky buildings and moved in until the inevitable fires drove them out, as TV cameras recorded their misery. The city built one-hundred thousand low-rent apartments in twelve months, the problem vanished, yet Beijingers barely noticed. China has been building homes for a million people, the entire housing stock of San Francisco, every month since 1950.


China's landlords, the world's oldest social class, maintained their grip on the country's land for three thousand years until, in 1949, Mao placed it in public trust, divided [1] it, and began a series of experiments that continue to this day.

In 1960 he combined individual plots into communal farms for the Great Leap Forward. In 1978, Deng redivided them into family plots that proved inefficient, but attempts to recombine them into larger, more efficient farms failed until 2012. Then a Trial Spot in Sihong County created land management rights that farmers could rent or pledge as collateral, so long as their land remained agricultural.

Beijing promoted Sihong's solution nationwide and, today, millions of rural people are unlocking twenty-two trillion dollars of previously inaccessible wealth. One farmer, Sun Zeshun [2], leased his plot to an agribusiness corporation, became a roofing contractor in a nearby town, and used his new income to build a house and buy an SUV:

"Life is much better now. I have more freedom and my income is less affected by weather."

Urban experiments began in 1953 when, to maintain food production and prevent slum formation, the government issued urban hukou, residency permits, to rural people only if they attended university, joined the Army, or worked in state-owned enterprises. The UN's Alain Bertaud [3] says, "Urbanization didn't happen because the government wanted the country to urbanize they actually kept the hukou in order to slow it down. But the economy asked for it and people voted with their feet.

The government has to cope with urbanization rather than it being a deliberate policy decision. In a way, they are paying the price of this rapid urbanization now. Every year since then, as housing becomes available, ten million people converted their rural hukou into urban permits and soon, only Tibet will retain hukou so, people won't move to the country and overgraze fragile ecosystems.

(Image by TGP website (shutterstock))   Details   DMCA

In 1960, city governments began building hundreds of millions of homes to accommodate the biggest baby boom in history, and, though individual floor space was only forty square feet, they charged tenants nominal rent. Planners trying to build a more productive economy saw housing as a nonproductive expense, but public attachment to its low cost accommodation made reform difficult.

Then, in 1981, a Housing Privatization Trial Spot encouraged renters to buy the homes they lived in for half their market value, and the experiment's success reverberated in every city in China. Within seven years, tenants purchased two-thirds of all urban housing-worth one-third of China's GDP-and unleashed the biggest real estate boom in world history.

Planners had capital to invest, the economy boomed, and housing became a pillar of the country's welfare system. When markets overheated, city governments simply released more land for development to keep housing supply aligned to local wage rises.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Godfree Roberts Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Doctorate in Education. Live in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A San Francisco Every Month: How China's Urbanization Pays for Itself

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend