Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Life Arts

A Reply to the New Vatican Document about "New Age" Spirituality

By       Message Thomas Farrell       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/27/10

Author 38575
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)
- Advertisement -

Duluth, MN (OpEdNews) February 25, 2010

In the spirit of circling the wagons for the sake of a more effective defense against an attack, the male chauvinists in the Vatican have issued a risible new document to help conservative Roman Catholics defend themselves from possible temptations of so-called "New Age" spirituality. The document is titled JESUS CHRIST THE BEARER OF THE WATER OF LIFE: A CHRISTIAN REFLECTION ON THE "NEW AGE."

- Advertisement -

But the title itself is risible because the conceptual construct "Jesus Christ" is a myth, not a fact. It's time for Christians to stop perpetuating this myth and to start living in historical time and space, instead of living in mythic time and space.

- Advertisement -

The historical Jesus was not the messiah, so Christians should stop using the Greek-derived term "the Christ" to refer to Jesus. The Greek-derived term "the Christ" is used to render the Hebrew term that is translated into English as "messiah." It is simply a myth to refer to Jesus as the Christ (or the messiah); it is not an historical fact.

The historical Jesus was crucified under the authority of Pontius Pilate at the time of the Passover festival in Jerusalem. But Pontius Pilate most likely ordered his crucifixion as a way to control the crowd so that there would be no protest rallies around Jesus. In any event, Jesus did not die for the sins of the world. That's a myth. In short, Jesus' death did not result in anybody being saved. That's a myth, not an historical fact.

- Advertisement -

Moreover, Jesus did not rise from the dead. Reports about apparitions of Jesus after his crucifixion were based on hallucinations. So the claim about his alleged resurrection is a myth, not an historical fact.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church