Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

A "Path To Yes" On Trade, But Paul Ryan Blocks It

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dave Johnson       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/24/15

Author 4387
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Campaign For America's Future

From youtube.com/watch?v=N5SlkovTO1E: Trans-Pacific Partnership=Government Corruption At Its Finest
Trans-Pacific Partnership = Government Corruption At Its Finest
(Image by YouTube)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

The "fast track" trade bill introduced last week by Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has a number of problems. It sets aside Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution and essentially pre-approves the secret Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) before the public and most of Congress even sees it. Unfortunately, the Senate bill does not specify firm and sufficient objectives to make TPP a trade bill that could work for 99 percent of Americans.

- Advertisement -

Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee, on Thursday offered an alternative, the Right Track for TPP Act of 2015. (Summary here, full text here.) This bill is a fast track process for doing trade right -- or at least for modifying the secretly negotiated TPP so it can be somewhat palatable to more of us than just the 1 percent.

Unfortunately, the House Ways and Means Committee's chairman, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), ruled the substitute measure "out of order," reported The Huffington Post.

What the Levin Alternative Would Have Done

- Advertisement -

According to Levin, these are some of the problems with the current fast track bill in the Senate:

(1) It has "general and vague negotiating objectives" that are nearly identical to last year's bill and does not provide congressional guidance on completing the negotiations in a way that can get bipartisan support.

(2) It leaves it up to the President, not Congress, to determine whether the agreement achieves the objectives spelled out in the bill.

(3) Even though TPP is in its "end game," the bill leaves it to the president to "develop guidelines on how to properly consult with Congress."

(4) The bill doesn't have a "meaningful" way for Congress to remove fast track.

"In short, the Hatch-Wyden-Ryan TPA bill (House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan helped write the bill) puts Congress in the back seat and greases the skids for an up-or-down vote after the fact."

To fix this, Levin's "right track" bill (according to a summary):

- Advertisement -

(1) Includes specific negotiating instructions on all of the major outstanding issues in the TPP negotiations;

(2) Does not provide for expedited consideration unless and until bipartisan groups of House and Senate trade advisers determine that the instructions were followed;

(3) Has Congress write the consultation procedures, including what negotiating texts must be shared with Congress and stakeholders; and

(4) Includes two usable mechanisms to enable Congress to remove expedited consideration where necessary.

Some of the specific instructions include a requirement that TPP:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Dave has more than 20 years of technology industry experience. His earlier career included technical positions, including video game design at Atari and Imagic. He was a pioneer in design and development of productivity and educational (more...)
 

Dave Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Three Charts To Email To Your Right-Wing Brother-In-Law

Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership Looks Like Corporate Takeover

Actually, "the Rich" Don't "Create Jobs," We Do

Now We Know Why Huge TPP Trade Deal Is Kept Secret From The Public

Does Clinton Really Oppose TPP? There Is A Test For That

Will TPP Kill The Post Office?