Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

A Clear Explanation Why the Twin Towers Collapsed

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   14 comments
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Aleksandar Sarovic
Become a Fan


(Image by Aleksandar Sarovic)   Details   DMCA

"A poo caused an avalanche which destroyed the twin towers."

The twin towers in New York were destroyed by two commercial planes piloted by terrorist hijackers on September 11, 2001. So far, a completely convincing scientific explanation of how the towers collapsed was not given, leaving a lot of space for speculations. I believe my interpretation gives a contribution to the straight answer.

The twin towers were two identical steel construction skyscrapers with bases of 60x60 meters, and heights of 110 floors. They were standing on massive steel columns located in the core and perimeters of the building. Steel columns were the most substantial part of the twin towers. They were 3" thick at the bottom of the building and a ┬╝ inch at the top. The big span between the core and perimeter columns required floors to be carried by the trusses. The trusses were the much weaker part of the buildings. They transferred their load to the columns connected by bolts.

The planes' impact of the twin towers did significant damage. It made big holes in the towers which disturbed the equilibrium of the construction. According to NIST, the planes destroyed 14% of the columns. The remaining construction elements had to take over the pressure from the torn down elements. All constructions have a safety factor which can withstand at least double the weight than planned. But some of the columns next to the ruined part of the towers have certainly overpassed the safety factor and were in substantial danger to collapse.


(Image by cassiopaea.org)   Details   DMCA

However, the whole steel construction of the twin towers was rigidly connected. Steel has an elastic ability to pass the burden from critically pressed elements, which cannot carry the pressure anymore, to the next parts which were not critically pressed. The force deforms the steel to the best position, which reduces dangerous bending moments and finds the greatest possible balance. Big holes from the airplanes' impacts were bridged by the steel facade construction above, which prevented the immediate collapse of the building section above the hole. It also prevented the destruction of the over-pressed columns located next to the hole. The problem was that the facade was not constructed to carry such burden, neither were the "bases" of this "bridge." The whole construction was unstable and prone to collapse.

Then fire from the planes' kerosene further deteriorated the carrying capacities of the already damaged steel construction. If there were no fire, the towers would most likely not collapse. They would probably be fixed and still standing today.

The fire damaged the weakest part of the floor construction first. The tiny elements of the trusses expanded in high temperature and the load from above loosened them. The loosened floor construction pulled the columns they were connected with and bent them. Every move of the structure caused by external pressure brought a new bending moment which additionally pressed and weakened the construction. The more the column bent, the more significant bending moment by the weight of the building was produced. The more significant bending moment weakened the columns more. However, the strength of construction was still able to resist all the chaos of attacking forces and was strong enough to stand. But, it was in significant danger to collapse.

The whole situation of the towers reminds me of a cartoon when a bird lands on top of a heavily damaged building and then poops. The poo caused the building to collapse. Now I will simplify the cartoon building collapse by comparing it to breaking a wooden stick. A stick would resist the bending power to the moment when tiny additional pressure snaps it, after which the stick does not resist anymore. In physics, this process is called buckling, which in this case is a sudden break of a stick structure bent by a more significant force than the stick is capable of withstanding. This is how the bird poo destroyed the building from the cartoon.

A very similar thing happened to the twin towers. But what was the bird's poo in the twin towers situation? A large number of people heard a huge bang before the collapse of the tower started. They assumed it was an explosion which destroyed the tower. But it was not an explosion. This bang came from the collapse of one floor or its part. Most likely this floor was the one most exposed to fire. Fire weakened the bolts which held the trusses of floors to the columns. They were the weakest part of the floor construction, and they broke. That increased the pressure on the remaining bolts which broke under the floor pressure and the floor collapsed on top of the level below. I analyzed what could produce this huge bang and found nothing else.

The shake of the building caused by the collapsed floor would, in normal circumstance, barely shake coffee in a cup. But that was the bird's poo from the cartoon. This shake destroyed the weak equilibrium of the steel construction and started an avalanche effect which destroyed the tower.

The South tower collapsed first. The plane hit the right side of the tower more, which hardly damaged the right side columns. The stress of the vibration of the collapsed floor suddenly reached the buckling effect of these columns, which started the whole collapse. The construction of this part of the building immediately transferred from an 18-meter long beam supported by two sides (core and exterior columns) to an 18-meter console supported by only one side. The core columns were suddenly attacked by the bending moment nine times stronger than was the weight of console. The construction was never strong enough to carry even a tiny fraction of that pressure. The columns at that floor bent and become unable to carry the pressure from above. Then the part of the building above the impact started collapsing. The unharmed building below the impact resisted the hit of many floors from above before it started collapsing under the enormous kinetic power of the weight above. The columns were crushed like nails hit by heavy hammers to a solid base. This started the cascading crush of the tower down, floor by floor, with a "trampoline bouncing effect" coming from the resistance of the building construction. It was accelerated by gravity and the additional weight of each floor.

The North tower had a central impact from the plane, which hardly damaged the core columns. The core columns carried the same weight as the exterior columns through the lesser dimensioned profile. (The exterior columns were over-dimensioned to resist strong winds) This most likely made the core columns in the North tower start the collapse slightly faster than the outdoor columns. The bending moment attacked the outdoor columns. This produced the inward implosion of the tower, making the building fall symmetrically. The symmetrical collapse presented that the bottom part of the tower was strong and resisted the impact of around ten floors (40,000 tons) from above before it collapsed. But the falling process in both towers was practically the same.

There were small differences in the collapse of the twin towers. The South tower collapsed first even though it was hit second. Why? The South tower was hit lower than the North so that the load above the plane's impact of the South tower was more significant than the pressure above the North. The more massive load quickened the collapse of the South tower even though it was burned less in the fire. Also, the South tower was hit on the side, producing a more significant bending moment attacking the columns, causing a faster fall than the centrally hit North tower.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Aleksandar Sarovic Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Aleksandar Sarovic is an architect and philosopher who has worked on how to create a good society for 37 years. According to him, equal human rights will unconditionally create a bright future of humankind. His findings are presented in the book "Humanism - A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society." His work is presented (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

My Investigation of 9/11

What God Wants

The Conspiracy of the World Exposed

Full employment is a turning point for capitalism

Let's remove unemployment

Do you love? (Part 3 of 3)

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

5 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments  Post Comment


Bob Stuart

Become a Fan
Author 26603

(Member since Nov 19, 2008), 3 fans, 1 articles, 543 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

This does not account for the symmetry of the collapses, nor does it explain the free-fall speeds. There is tremendous energy needed to break each floor, and that does not show up in the videos.

Building Seven was even stranger, and there are a thousand other details not addressed here.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:42:00 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Bob Stuart:   New Content

You are misinformed. The North tower collapsed symmetrically, the South did not. Each floor had 4,000 tons which produced enough energy to destroy the buildings as we saw it.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:45:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Stan Crawford

Become a Fan
Author 511938

(Member since Aug 15, 2018), 1 fan, 226 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

If the planes did crash into the buildings, it was not straight on like your diagram and kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel and most of it exploded outside the building, yet a "Terrorist" passport survived unscathed to be "found."


I suggest you read from your associates who disagree with your opinions. .ae911truth.org/


Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:48:06 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Stan Crawford:   New Content

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are paid by conspiarators who did 9/11 to destroy the truth. They might not knowing it.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:33:21 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Apr 4, 2008), 52 fans, 58 articles, 123 quicklinks, 4466 comments, 214 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Wow, Building 7 was not hit by a plane but collapsed anyway, all 47 floors, at 5:20 PM in just 6.5 seconds - a #NewStudy by the University of Alaska Fairbanks Engineering Department, Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, Professor, presiding, concludes that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fire but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building - scroll to #Legal Action #GetSomeJustice. #PrePlantedExplosives in "all three Towers - surely by someone? with "access" to "all three Towers"? who knew "how to do it"?.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:06:22 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Lance Ciepiela:   New Content

Physics which destroyed the Building 7 and the South Twin Tower is completely identical. The only difference is the South Tower starting collapsing at the impacted floor and Building 7 close to the ground. Building 7 was hit by debris of the Twin tower which damaged it less than the planes did in the Twin towers. Building 7 burned in fire much longer than the Twin towers. Building 7 was loaded with a heavier weight pressing the collapsed floor than the Twin towers. All these factors required more time for Building 7 to collapse.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:32:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Stan Crawford

Become a Fan
Author 511938

(Member since Aug 15, 2018), 1 fan, 226 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

There is more evidence the Bu$h/Buckshot DICK cabal were involved in the PNAC 9/11 than it being done by a former Ronald Reagan "Freedom Fighter" Osama Bin Laden.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:47:04 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

It was not directly related to 9/11.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:35:22 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Becky Comstock

Become a Fan
Author 512956

(Member since Jan 23, 2019), 143 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content
This video shows the mechanism of collapse initiation, starting at 1:18. The force involved in the destruction is simple gravity, not any kind of explosives, unless it was some new kind we've never heard of that sucks things inward.

There was no need for explosives given the massive force of the descending block of building above the impact zone. Even idiots Bush and Cheney knew this when they instructed the pilots on where to hit the buildings.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 6:53:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Becky Comstock:   New Content

Hi Becky, do you sometimes read articles you comment? This article presents that explosives were not used:-)

But I do not agree with you saying Bush and Chaney were involved. Bush would never dare to do it. Besides, why would he do it? Did he personally profit from it? No way. The rich did it without the Government.

If you invest an effort reading me, you will find precisely the first and last name of the person who did it.

Submitted on Friday, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:44:16 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Becky Comstock

Become a Fan
Author 512956

(Member since Jan 23, 2019), 143 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Aleksandar Sarovic:   New Content

My attempt was to support your contention, Aleksander. I don't know why you jumped to the conclusion that I didn't read your article. Of course you're correct that there were no explosives used that day in the towers.

I would urge you however to include in your arguments the video I linked to above, or similar ones, of which there are many. Your analysis is great and welcome, but to simply observe the actual collapse initiations and see that they were so obviously the result of structural failure, and not some kind of explosive event, is a very powerful convincer, in my opinion. And I would hope yours.

The Bush and Cheney reference was meant to be humorous, but also to illustrate absurdity with the absurd. It's about as likely and believable that Bush and Cheney met with Atta to discuss flight plans as it is to believe that the buildings were wired with explosives coordinated perfectly with the plane impacts, both of which were precisely located and timed for that perfect footprint controlled demolition.

Thank you for being one of the few here willing to inject some common sense against these sans-evidence theories regarding the towers and the Pentagon. I only hope you'll eventually absolve yourself of your "Big Capital" theory!

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:39:58 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Becky Comstock:   New Content

I cannot know what people think unless they express what they think.

If the reference about Bush is humorous, then you should explain why? There is no other power which can create such conspiracies besides "Big Capital." They control the western world and plan to conquer the rest. My first article here in OEN presents how they do it.

Submitted on Saturday, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:31:19 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Stan Crawford

Become a Fan
Author 511938

(Member since Aug 15, 2018), 1 fan, 226 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

There is No legitimate reason why the towers fell. Many tall structures have survived intact much grater fire/heat far longer periods of time and didn't fall.


Just read this about Building #7; click here

Submitted on Sunday, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:17:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since May 24, 2019), 13 articles, 225 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Stan Crawford:   New Content

9/11 Truth is paid by the conspirators to propagate nonsense about 9/11. It is paid to destroy the truth.

Submitted on Sunday, Sep 15, 2019 at 1:33:24 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment