Maybe all of us stuck in Western
'civilization,' have come to respect
ledger line calculation for highest return on the dollar invested as
dictating events. The
Wall Street that made about a million every month funding and
participating in World War One made a billion a month on average during
World War Two. It would be expected to make a trillion dollars a month
during the World War Three being openly planned. In the Western banking
civilization of lobotomized minds, the highest return on investment
rules. A perhaps more urgent reason for war is to prevent the
approaching loss of economic hegemony to China and the rising economies
of other nations with huge work force available populations (as was
already reviewed above).
Preparations Plans for World War Three NOT AN ISSUE FOR DISCUSSION
In 1899, fifteen years
before the outbreak of WW I, America's peoples economist Thorsten Veblen
assumed "depression to be the normal condition in a
business-enterprise economy, to be relieved by war, and expansion
abroad." [Theory of the Leisure Class, p.110]
We live in a world of televised upside down perception, permanently
distorted like the mirrors in a fun house. We are mis and dis educated
already as children by sources of information almost entirely owned by
investors in the neocolonialist, imperialist style, illegal and
genocidal use of national armed forces, secret services, organized
religion and monolithic media. These ubiquitous sources of information
mold our thinking for the ultra massive commercial profit of that 1/10th
of one percent of Americans illicitly maintaining power over society. A
monolithic media cartel, owned by our ruling speculative investment
banking industry, inculcates both unnatural desires that are pernicious
and detrimental to our well being and animosities that are used to make
continuous genocide acceptable and seen as needed. There is zero
interest in a million murdered Iraqi children in our Western
in-human de-civilization.
It
is the insane world that considers the centuries long genocidal
plundering of all Africa, the Americas and most of Asia, including
incredibly wealthier and infinitely more scientifically and culturally
advanced peoples, as having been natural behavior. During these
centuries, farm boy soldiers from Portugal, Spain, Holland, France and
England have gawked in astonishment and bewilderment at the Taj Mahal in
India, the Forbidden City in China, the Aztec city of Tenochtitlan, the
colossal temples of Egypt and other never seen before creations of
civilized human beings. Soon enough thereafter came the imposition of
the upside down logic that the conquered, slaughtered, enslaved and
looted nations were 'underdeveloped' and needing of European Christian
assistance.
Candidate Fervor in Dual Party Gang Presidential Elections is Political Theater Because Presidents Must Do As They're Told[9]
If
there is any usefulness in the more than year long played-out election
charade of a voting public being permitted to chose between the
candidates of the two political gangs that run the country in collusion
to prevent any real aspect of rule by the citizens themselves, it lies
in the nation wide discussion of at least some of the issues that
Americans feel are affecting their lives. Discussion despite criminal
corporate owned media intending to dictate what should be discussed or
not discussed. Which of the two political gangs chosen candidates
becomes President pales in importance compared with the slight chance
that the public might raise its awareness on important issues that
concern the quality of life itself, for who ever is president can not be
his own man (or woman) by the nature of the distribution of power
within the superpower USA.
There
is a goodly amount of the more discerning, who are no longer fooled
into believing presidents are allowed to have personal power to make
major policy decisions of their own and not necessarily adhere to the
decisions taken within the financial element in the centers of power
that Franklin Delano Roosevelt confided has owned the government since
the 1830s.[9] FDR was the last wealthy aristocratic president, who had
at least a voice within that financial element, but tellingly, he often
felt the need to call for citizens to demand what he would then be able
to do, hinting that the financial element which owned the government
expected a beholden US president to be a facilitator of policies already
decided upon, not an initiator of policies unapproved by people above
him. The readers might keep in mind that four US presidents were
assassinated on the surface of things for getting out of line, imagining
in one case that a president could get away with firing the head of the
CIA, who was a right hand man of scion David Rockefeller?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
