28 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 38 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H4'ed 1/6/14

Yikes! Yuval Levin is Resurrecting Edmund Burke (BOOK REVIEW)

By       (Page 6 of 10 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   5 comments
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

Burke and Paine were both British. They were both prolific writers. Neither one of them was a Tory. On the contrary, they were both Whigs. Each considered himself to be a liberal.

 

But Paine participated in both the American Revolution and the French Revolution -- and published a work that helped advance each. Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense (1776) famously helped galvanize sentiment for the American Revolution. His Rights of Man (1791), a critique of Burke's views, supported the French Revolution. However, as Levin notes, late in his life, Paine published a strong critique of Christianity titled The Age of Reason (published in three parts in 1794, 1795, 1807). As a result, Protestant preachers at the time denounced him as something like the devil -- the Great Satan, as it were. Basically, Paine was a Deist. To this day, because of the predictable backlash to his critique of Christianity, Paine is usually not remembered by most Americans as one of our Founding Fathers

 

From a distance Burke had supported the American Revolution, but he did not write anything noteworthy about it. However, he was understandably terrified at the thought of something like the French Revolution occurring in his homeland. So he wrote the pamphlet that is known by the short title as Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790). But the full title reveals more about the scope of his concerns: Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings of Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event: In a Letter Intended to Have Been Sent to a Gentleman in Paris. As Levin explains, Burke's invoked audience of a gentleman in Paris is a charade. Burke is clearly addressing his fellow Brits.

 

In the spirit of giving credit where credit is due, I should give Levin credit for working out a fine comparison and contrast of the thought of these two authors. He has written an informed and readable study in the history of ideas. However, as I've indicated, I do not think that he published this book simply to impress us with his scholarship. Instead, he uses his careful historical scholarship to advance movement conservatism in the United States today.

 

Now, the assassination of Julius Caesar was designed to bring about a regime change. It prompted a debate. For example, Cicero wrote a famous defense of the assassination of Julius Caesar -- and he subsequently paid the ultimate price for doing so. I would situate Burke's writings about the French Revolution in the larger context of the debate about Julius Caesar's assassination and regicide to bring about regime change. I was surprised that Levin did not happen to advert to the body of literature about regicide to bring about regime change.

 

 

THE RIGHT AND LEFT IN AMERICAN POLITICS TODAY

 

 

In addition to his scholarly comparison and contrast of the thought of these two authors, Levin makes a claim on our contemporary awareness by suggesting that Burke and Paine somehow represent of the birth of the right and left today. In effect, he proposes that American conservatives today should see Burke as the founding father of movement conservatism and Paine as the founding father of all the ideas that drive American conservatives crazy. In short, the right and the left -- as understood by American conservatives.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend