Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The End of Economic Growth

By       (Page 6 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   7 comments
Author 8235
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark
Become a Fan
  (108 fans)

 

Increasing efficiency means doing more with less.   In the U.S., the number of inflation-adjusted dollars generated in the economy for every unit of energy consumed has increased steadily over recent decades.  Another way of saying the same thing is that  the amount of energy, in British Thermal Units, required to produce a dollar of GDP dropped from close to 20,000 BTU per dollar in 1949 to 8,500 BTU in 2008.   Part of this increasing efficiency has come about as a result of the outsourcing of manufacturing to other nations -- which burn the coal, oil, or natural gas to make our goods.   (If we were making our own running shoes and LCD TVs, we'd be burning that energy domestically).  

 

Economists also point to another, related form of efficiency that has less to do with energy (in a direct way, at least).  I refer to  the process of identifying the cheapest sources of materials, and the places where workers will be most productive and will work for the lowest wages.   As we increase efficiency, we use less -- less energy, resources, labor, or money -- to do more.   That enables more growth.

 

Finding substitutes for depleting resources and upping efficiency are undeniably effective adaptive strategies of market economies.   Nevertheless, the question remains:   for how much longer will these strategies continue to work in the real world, which is now governed less by economic theories than by the laws of physics.   In the real world, some things don't any longer have substitutes, or the substitutes are too expensive, or don't work as well, or can't be produced fast enough, or are extremely dangerous, as we've just seen in Japan.  

 

Efficiency follows the law of diminishing returns, which means that the first gains in efficiency are usually cheap, but that every further incremental gain tends to cost more than the last, until further gains become prohibitively expensive.

 

As wages rise elsewhere, we can't forever outsource so much of our manufacturing.   Nor can we   transport goods around the world with anything approaching the ever lower energy costs that will be necessary to profitably do so, and we can't forever count on enough workers to buy our products while paying ever more of them next to nothing (so that short-term profits for individual CEOs and stockholders can be maximized).

 

Unlike most economists, most physical scientists understand that growth within any functioning and bounded system eventually has to stop.

 

The simple math of compounded growth

 

The argument for an eventual end to growth is ultimately very simple.   Here's why:   If any quantity grows steadily by a certain fixed percentage each year, it will double in size every so-many years;   the higher the percentage growth rate, the sooner the doubling.   A rough method of figuring doubling-times is known as the "Rule of 70':   Dividing the number from the percentage growth rate into 70 gives the approximate time, in years, required for the initial quantity to double.   Therefore, if a quantity is growing at 1% per year, it will double in 70 years; at 2% per year growth, it will double in 35 years; at 5% growth, it will double in only (70/5) 14 years, and so on.  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Valuable 5   Must Read 4   Supported 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Clark Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: