42 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Lynne Stewart Loses Appeal

By       (Page 6 of 8 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message Stephen Lendman
Become a Fan
  (191 fans)

This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Lynne failed to win a sentence reduction. She claimed her First Amendment rights were violated. Second Circuit judges disagreed, saying:

"Stewart was not punished for violating a governmental restriction on speech."

"The district court did not treat her speech as a violation of any law--it considered the content of that speech to be helpful in enabling the court to craft a sentence 'sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes set forth' " elsewhere in sentencing guidelines.

"Stewart does indeed argue that she was prosecuted and punished for her political beliefs. The most obvious -- and fatal -- shortcoming in Stewart's argument in the context of this appeal is that there is not a hint in the record of any fact to support an assertion that the district court did so."

"The sentencing judge was determining the characteristics of the defendant, which were legally relevant to a determination of the appropriate sentence to impose on Stewart, through the comments she voluntarily and publicly made."

Jeff Mackler is West Coast Coordinator of the Lynne Stewart Defense Committee. On June 29, he headlined "Court Confirms Ten-Year Sentence for Lynne Stewart," saying:

Lynne's 2005 conviction was "outrageous." Her "crime" was doing the right thing. US "justice" finds that intolerable in defending clients prosecutors want to convict.

"Barring an unlikely Supreme Court reversal, she will now serve her ten-year sentence with perhaps a one-year or ten percent reduction for 'good behavior.' "

Justice Department prosecutors and hanging judges sought vengeance. They took issue with Lynne's sworn duty to represent all clients honorably. She didn't "bow to authority (or show) required deference." They rejected her three core arguments:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Lendman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  My two Wall Street books are timely reading: "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend