It is typical of Bellingcat. It is also worrying, given Bellingcat's large influence on journalists who do not perform any investigations, not even into the financing of that group.
Bellingcat states that you have never faulted and corrected MH17 investigative results from the JIT and Bellingcat. What is your reaction to that?
This is a typical Bellingcat approach. They make the frame and others have to respond. I now set my own frame for this: The Ukrainian intelligence service, SBU, is the main supplier of the evidence to the JIT, and Bellingcat acts as a conduit. I'm doing an article on this. Get ready.
The original Dutch language version of this article was published July 11th 2018 on Novini
Eric van de Beek studied journalism at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences and philosophy at the University of Amsterdam. He worked as a journalist for Dutch geopolitical magazine Novini.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
