Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds


By       Message Anthony Barnes     Permalink
      (Page 5 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 10/11/11

Author 2425
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)
- Advertisement -

It is such rhetoric that as drawn so many so-called "personal responsibility" Tea Party conservative types under Rand's spell.   But the irony lies not in the fact that -- contrary to the assumptions of some conservatives -- social Darwinism as a concept, originated neither with their hero Rand, nor with its namesake, Charles Darwin . The incongruity stems from a narrative related to both Rand and the actual scholar who many credit for presenting the concept.  

Note that Rand's base philosophy of "objectivism" relies on the embrace of what she terms "rational egoism," or, a coherent path of pure self-interest in which the moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness.    Thus, in some ways it should come as no surprise that among the enraptured include " Path to Prosperity " federal budget proposal author, Tea Party fave, and former Oscar-Meyer " Wienermobile " driver, Wisconsin Republican congressman Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee.

- Advertisement -

"The reason I got involved in public service " if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand," stated Ryan in an article posted on AlterNet this past January.

But Ryan's inclusion among the smitten is obviously something no one should find surprising; after all, many of his hero's views are boilerplate Tea Party swagger: anti-federal government; an emphasis on states' rights; unregulated personal freedom; and a lean, if not emaciated federal government; concepts which appear to have inspired perhaps the most controversial feature of the Ryan budget plan -- its proposal to end Medicare by the year 2022.  

But if you think eliminating Medicare is a proposal Rand would support were she alive today, you probably want to think again.   In spite of her clamorous expressions of contempt for government entanglement in the lives and affairs of its citizens, Rand, writes Jim Magruder of the liberal website Policy , "was a fraud who died dependent on Social Security and Medicare."

Rand's descent from being one of the foremost apostles preaching disdain for government largess to recipient of government entitlements fosters images of those older Tea Party supporters who'd roll into anti-Obamacare rallies on government-subsidized powered wheelchairs -- Hoverounds -- to rail against federal government programs while simultaneously demanding that the government "keep its hands off my Medicare."

- Advertisement -

Meanwhile, regarding historian Richard Hofstadter (1916-1970) -- the person many credit with bringing into a broader light, the socio-biological theories establishing the basis of social Darwinism pioneered by 19th century philosopher Herbert Spencer -- the narrative has a similar ironic twist.  Hofstadter, a Columbia University professor, is author of Social Darwinism in American Thought , published in 1944, and considered the writing that delivered the concept into the public lexicon.  But in addition to being a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and respected scholar, Hofstadter, during the 1930's, was also a member of the Young Communist League, and later, a full member of the U. S. Communist Party.   

"My fundamental reason for joining (the Communist Party)," wrote Hofstadter in Social Darwinism, "is that I don't like capitalism, and want to get rid of it."

For those who recognize the hypocrisy which runs amok within the Tea Party conservative movement, it is neither surprising nor ironic to learn that two figures of significance to conservative dogma -- one central to it, and the other related in an indirect way -- are guilty of behavior that is either anti-conservative (accepting federal government "handouts"), or have expressed support for economic concepts (communism) that are completely contrary to Tea Party conservative philosophy. And since cognitive dissonance in ideology has long been an issue for the extreme right, reaching the conclusion that contradictions such as those involving conservative heroes like Rand (and presumably, Hofstadter) simply don't matter is something that comes quite easily.

"The Republicans," as observed Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) during an early October interview on MSNBC's Politics Nation , "are torn between their ideology and reality."

Indeed, they are Congressman Frank.

Welcome to Hard Right Utopia.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Anthony Barnes, of Boston, Massachusetts, is a free-lance writer who leans toward the progressive end of the political spectrum. "When I was a young man, I wanted to change the world. I found it was difficult to change the world, so I tried to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

SURPRISE! Chris Christie's 2016 Gambit

Starlight and Shadows



ERRORS AND NO FACTS: Business as Usual at Fox News

Death of the Republican Party