This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
It's only able to intercept "fairly primitive rockets." Most more sophisticated ones land untouched. Take Israeli claims with a grain of salt. It wants adversaries to think it can foil them.
Michel Chossudovsky called attacking Gaza "Part of a Broader US-NATO-Israeli Military Agenda." Conflict beginning on November 14 was well-planned months in advance. Israel deliberately provoked it.
Victims are blamed for what Israel planned and initiated. The same scenario played out numerous times before. Western media claim Israeli attacks are "part of a legitimate counter-terrorism agenda."
In fact, Pillar of Cloud is Israel's latest naked aggression. Obama approved it. Washington and Israel partner directly or indirectly in all regional conflicts.
Attacking Gaza bears directly on "US-NATO-Israeli war plans pertaining to Lebanon, Syria and Iran."
Timing is always significant. Attacks followed one week after US elections and ahead of scheduled January ones in Israel.
Pillar of Cloud was no isolated event. It relates directly to a broader imperial regional agenda. More wars are planned. Syria appears closer to full-scale Western intervention.
Hezbollah may be targeted. At issue is isolating Iran, increasing pressure, and perhaps attacking its nuclear and military infrastructure. Don't expect scoundrel media to explain.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
3
2
2
