Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
General News

Part 2 Lawrence Wilkerson Transcript; Military Power-- More Dangerous, Worse Than A Coup

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall       (Page 4 of 10 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   News 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/16/12

Become a Fan
  (305 fans)
- Advertisement -


Lawrence Wilkerson:

I was.


- Advertisement -

Rob Kall:    Is that what you were about to say?   [laughing]


Lawrence Wilkerson:

- Advertisement -

That ' s what I was about to say.


Rob Kall:    Now, we have to get each other a beer then, clearly .   [laughing]   And do you think Obama faces the same kinds of considerations when he makes decisions, in terms of standing up to the Generals and the Joint Chiefs of Staff ?   Even the ones he's appointed?   

Lawrence Wilkerson:

I asked this question of my seminars for the past three years.   And the way I put it is, in December 2009, one December I guess was the day he actually made the decision, I said, I asked my students to say, "Do you think President Obama had any choice about the surge in Afghanistan? '  And my students, you know they sort of puzzle over it for a moment or two, but generally I asked them this question after they've had a few seminars and they understand a little bit about the military industrial complex , the Oval Office, the Pentagon, the military, the National Security State, and so forth and so on .   And generally speaking, they pretty much,   to a person, come to the conclusion that "No, he didn't have a choice '.   

- Advertisement -

First of all, he sort of walked himself into a corner, painted himself into a corner if you will, by his campaign rhetoric.   He said Afghanistan was the right war, and we should be emphasizing Afghanistan.   So that, he ' d sort of trapped himself.   But once he gets in the Oval Office, he doesn't know squat! The exception would be maybe Dwight Eisenhower, maybe George Washington, and we ' ve had, I can count them on one hand, the Presidents we've had,     who were prepared for the office.   

So here ' s Obama.   He ' s sitting there and the DNIs ' briefing him , the Directors of National Intelligence , the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff , maybe even the combined Chiefs of Staff .   The CIA Head is briefing him , the Secretary of State is briefing him.   All of these people are giving him his decision on a silver platter!   So, if you're going to surge in Afghanistan, you're going to surge in Afghanistan!   You don't have any choice !   It's frustrating for my students to come to that realization.   It's frustrating for Americans, if they sit and think about it, to come to that realization .   But let's face it, that's what it ' s all about, and if you believe in our system of government, in the way it works, you say "Well, that's the way it should be ' .   Because we cannot elect a man who is all knowing, all proficient, and militarily competent and so forth, all in one.    And yet when you think about it, it's scary, because I've seen it work, and I've seen it work to the detriment of this country .  And it's not a pretty thing to watch work.  The President is trapped .   He ( or she , some day) don't have much maneuver space between the eight hundred pound gorillas that occupy the advisory position s to them:   Their Ministers, their National Security Advisors, their intel people and so  forth, all trap them.   And it ' s very difficult to   maneuver outside that trap.   What do you maneuver with?   Your intellect?   I'm sorry, no one's intellect matches the complexity of the security and foreign policy challenges that America confronts today.   No one's!   In fact, I would argue that very seldom do you get a collective intellect in the government that matches these challenges.   The best you can hope for is a sixty or a sixty five percent [60-65%] success rate.   Recently, we haven't even had that. And that tells you something about the nature of our system.      

Rob Kall:    Incredible!   Yeah.   It makes sense.   So what is the answer?   So what, do you have any ideas for how to fix this ?    

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10


- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   News 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It


Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver