Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Mr. President, U.N. Resolutions do not trump U.S. Law

By       (Page 4 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 34072
Message Andrew Steele
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

It's only one paragraph...not even a full half of the page.

Again it lists UNSCR 1973 as (the already debunked) justification for the President's military action in Libya with no immediate threat to U.S. national security cited.  The short argument made for continuing the U.S. military's role in Libya is, essentially, that if the U.S. withdrew its military support in Libya, its NATO allies might be unable to continue alone, and if they withdrew before the meaningless September 27th NATO extension passed, NATO would lose credibility.

Maybe, or perhaps (more likely) President Obama would.

On the flip side, however, the U.S. Constitution would gain more credibility.  (No, we mustn't have that.)


Pages 14-16 lay out the cost for U.S. military operations in Libya, 17-19 the cost for humanitarian operations, and page 20 lists the cost for the Department of State's operations.  While this is all useful information, it's irrelevant to the argument.


Page 21--"Analysis of Impact on U.S. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan"-- is also irrelevant but interesting.  The one page argument reassures the reader that the war in Libya has not had any significant operational impact on the activities of the U.S. in Iraq and Afghanistan.  In relation to the DOD's operations in these countries it states:

"All the forces that were briefly diverted from other operations have been replaced, with the exception of one Guided Missile Destroyer (DDG). That capability will be replaced during June 2011. In some cases, forces were delayed in arriving in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the operational impact was mitigated by forces already supporting these operations."

Hey, wait a second...I thought we were trying to remove our forces from those countries.  The U.S. is supposed to start a drawdown of troops from Afghanistan next month, and all U.S. forces are supposed to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.   Just last summer President Obama went on TV and declared an end to the combat mission in Iraq.  (Tell that to the families of the two U.S. soldiers who died during an insurgent attack in Iraq this week, or the pilot of the U.S. military helicopter that engaged in combat with insurgents in Iraq on Wednesday. )


Pages 22 and 23 go on to explain the operations of the Transitional National Council of Libya, the political interaction the U.S. has with it, and its transition planning to an eventual new government.

On page 23 it is written:

"To facilitate the vesting of assets blocked by the United States, the Administration supports Senate Bill 1180 (which hasn't been passed yet) that would allow the United States to confiscate property of the Government of Libya to be used for costs related to providing humanitarian relief to the Libyan people. Under this vesting authority, the President would have the authority to decide precisely how the assets would be used, consistent with the legislation. The President would only disburse assets through means that meet our legal and policy standards regarding transparent oversight of the disbursements."

So while the President is not asking for congressional approval to wage war, he is asking for approval to steal the property of the Libyan government in the name of offsetting the costs for humanitarian relief during the war. 


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Andrew Steele Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Andrew Steele is the editor of America 20xy-- an independent news service that highlights articles from around the web focusing on international and economic policy, and human rights abuses. The mission statement for the page is a quote from Thomas (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Recall Those in Congress Who Voted for the NDAA

Facebook-- Pied Piper of the New World Order's technological control grid

Forget Privacy and Dignity...Body Scanners will also cause major delays

Breitbart's death needs to be investigated for the sake and safety of ALL journalists

Wake up! Obama's Libyan Rebels are Carrying Out Genocide of Black Africans

WikiLeaks documents-- disinformation or not-- are being used for anti-Iran propaganda

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: