This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
F. William Engdahl, lashed at the Reuters report on pages of 21 Century Wire:
"In August Reuters published an article under the headline, "UN says it has credible reports that China holds million Uighurs in secret camps." A closer look at the article reveals no official UN policy statement, but rather a quote from one American member of an independent committee that does not speak for the UN, a member with no background in China. The source of the claim it turns out is a UN independent advisory NGO called Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination. The sole person making the charge, American committee member Gay McDougall, stated she was "deeply concerned" about "credible reports." McDougall cited no source for the dramatic charge.
Reuters in their article boosts its claim by citing a murky Washington DC based NGO, the Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD). In an excellent background investigation, researchers at the Grayzone Project found that the CHRD gets hundreds of thousands of dollars from unnamed governments. The notorious US government NGO, National Endowment for Democracy, is high on the list of usual suspects. Notably, the CHRD official address is that of the Human Rights Watch which gets funds also from the Soros foundation."
This is how the new chapter of anti-Chinese ideological attacks (and attempts to stop them) began.
And soon, they intensified. The Western propaganda apparatus unleashed dozens of articles, which, while claiming that China has been building several detention centers for Uyghurs in Xingjian, failed to provide any proof that extreme harsh measures were being applied against the religious and political extremists in Northwest China.
The most amateurish, speculation-based one, was printed on June 1, 2019, by The Telegraph ("China's Uighur Muslims forced to eat and drink as Ramadan celebrations banned"):
"Beijing has long sought to arrest control of this resource-rich region where decades of government-encouraged migration of the Han China's ethnic majority have fuelled resentment among Uighurs. The biggest outburst erupted in 2009 in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, resulting in 200 deaths.
Now, the ruling Communist Party has launched a propaganda campaign about snuffing out "criminal" and "terrorist" activity. All across Xinjiang meaning "new frontier" are bright red banners reminding people to fight illegal, "cult" behaviour, listing hotlines to report suspicious activity.
"Love the Party, love the country," hangs a streamer at one mosque, just above the metal detector. A highway billboard proclaims, "Secretary Xi is linked heart-to-heart with Xinjiang minorities," referring to Chinese president Xi Jinping.
The government is working to present an image of a happy, peaceful Xinjiang, in efforts to boost tourism and attract investment; this is the linchpin for Mr. Xi's Belt and Road initiative."
Many thinkers, however, have been bravely putting this kind of 'reporting' into context. My close friend and co-author of our book "China and Ecological Civilization", a leading U.S. philosopher and progressive theologian, John Cobb Jr., has many years of involvement in China. He wrote for this reportage:
"A standard tactic of the U.S. government is to create situations in which another government has little choice but to use violence. Its use of violence is then treated as proof that "regime-change" is needed. Sometimes it even justifies war. The Iranians shooting down an American spy drone, for example, almost led to an overt American attack on Iran. China has been placed in such a situation with regard to one of its Islamic minorities. There is real danger that the Uighurs will use violence against China. China thus far has responded by an effort at massive, compulsory re-education which can be depicted as forcing citizens to spend much of their time in "concentration camps." That the minority is Islamic is then used in American propaganda to imply that China persecutes religion. Propaganda can also create anti-Chinese feeling among religious people all over the world, and especially among Muslims both in China and elsewhere.
If we think that anything that weakens those who refuse American domination is good, then we can admire the skill of the CIA. If we care for truth and justice, our task is to bring to light the cruelty and injustice of the subversion and the lies."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).