Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 98 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Life Arts    H4'ed 10/19/11  

Justin Frank, M.D., Puts President Obama on the Couch (BOOK REVIEW)

By       (Page 4 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   7 comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

In the introduction Dr. Frank says that Obama "is infinitely complex, the embodiment of one-who-creates-ambivalence-in-all-individuals" (page 1). How's that for a thumb-nail characterization of our president? Nevertheless, Dr. Frank says that President Obama is "generally in excellent mental health" (page 3). By his excellent mental health, Dr. Frank means "his emotional health" (page 4). But Dr. Frank makes it resoundingly clear that Obama has certain blind spots, which Dr. Frank interprets as probably arising from psychological repressions in his psyche.

 

Question: How many among us do not have psychological repressions in our psyches? As we read Dr. Frank's analysis of the president, many of us will probably wonder about our own psyches and psychological development.

 

As mentioned, Dr. Frank works with Melanie Klein's approach to psychoanalysis, which of course he has to explain to us. Because he does explain her approach to us with numerous concrete applications involving Obama, this book is a tutorial in her approach to psychoanalysis. Indeed, this book is a kind of tutorial in Freudian psychoanalytic thought. But Dr. Frank is obviously not working with transferences evoked in Obama's psyche and brought up in one-to-one sessions with Dr. Frank as the psychotherapist. If transferences from the client and counter-transferences experienced by the psychotherapist are the heart of psychoanalysis, then Dr. Frank's psychoanalysis of Obama can be described as heartless, lacking the heart of psychoanalysis.

 

Based on her observations of young babies, Klein posits that in their psyches babies split their impressions into two broad categories. But let's start with the basics: containment and abandonment. The "good enough" mother figures out how to hold the baby and appropriately respond to and thereby contain the baby's crying. The baby's crying is an expression of the baby's anxieties. The baby's expression of his or her anxieties register on the mother. The mother feels the baby's anxieties. The mother's experience of empathy for the baby's anxieties leads the mother to respond in an emotionally appropriate way to comfort the baby's anxieties.

 

But what happens when the mother herself is somehow the source of the baby's anxieties, in the baby's perception? In such cases, the baby begins splitting. Dr. Frank writes that "the healthy development of the splitting mechanism [is] a process that good parenting can facilitate" (page 14). Simple splitting involves splitting "our internal world as well as our perception of the external world into good and bad" (page 14). The splitting process "begins a process of establishing the two opposing attitudes that Klein noted the infant demonstrates toward aggression: [1] the "paranoid-schizoid position,' in which aggression is perceived as emanating from outside the self and the infant feels anxiety about being attacked, and [2] the "depressive position,' in which aggression is experienced as coming from within the self and the infant feels anxiety about being hurtful in a way that might harm a loved one" (page 15).

 

So without the benefit of transferences and counter-transferences, Dr. Frank proposes to undertake to psychoanalyze Barack Hussein Obama in terms of the two major constructs established by Klein: (1) the paranoid-schizoid position and (2) the depressive position. But don't jump to any conclusions regarding these two positions based on the highly suggestive names of the two positions. It turns out that each of these two positions can contributed positively and enormously to our mental and emotional health. "Compassion and acceptance of the "Other' are essential to the depressed position," Dr. Frank tells us (page 16). Obama excels in acceptance of the "Other." "A person firmly rooted in the depressive position takes responsibility and feels genuine concern for other based on self-knowledge of his own aggression and is generally mentally healthy and mature" (page 15). However, "Obama often seems unparanoid and unprepared for the hatred of his opponents . . . despite the evidence before his very eyes. Nor does he grasp the degree to which his opponents -- like most people -- are dominated by the paranoid-schizoid position of black-and-white thinking" (page 15).

 

Briefly stated, Dr. Frank sees Candidate Obama drawing on the orientation of the paranoid-schizoid position very effectively in his presidential campaign. But Dr. Frank sees President Obama more or less switching from the paranoid-schizoid position and switching to the depressive position. "People who have put their internal splits into perspective can be more decisive because they are not afraid of destroying other parts of themselves" (page 27).

 

In any event, Dr. Frank says, "As the baby internalizes the mother's love, splitting lessens in degree and intensity, and the baby develops confidence in his love for her, and in the environment in general" (pages 13-14). Obama conspicuously abounds with self-confidence. So we can conclude that baby Obama internalized his young mother's generous love.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend