Figure. State of Israel v Shem-Tov et al (14280-04-17) in the Tel-Aviv District Court: The docket shows (yellow frame) the entry on May 15, 2017 of "Request" by "Requester 1", which is "Supreme Court Decision". The two top docket lines show a May 22, 2017 entry, again "Request" by "Requester 1", which is docketed as "Censored Indictment". The Israeli district courts have been administered since 2010 using an electronic case management system -- Net-HaMishpat -- with multiple, invalid, partial dockets, which enables judges to unlawfully and arbitrarily hide court records and entire court files.
_____
" Requester 1" also filed on May 22, 2017 an additional "Request" in the Tel-Aviv District Court, which was docketed as "Censored Indictment-- The recent filing of the "censored indictment" may be an attempt to retroactively 'kosher' the central fraud in this case. Two different indictment records were produced by the prosecution in this case: One was entered in the trial court file and another one was served on the detainees in jail. Furthermore, the District Court claimed that the mere service of the falsified indictment record on the detainees (who had no defense counsel at the time) amounted to lawful arraignment. Defense counsel, who filed petitions in the Supreme Court challenged the lawfulness of such purported arraignment. However, defense counsel didn't mention the key fact - that the indictment record, which was served on the jailed Defendants was not the authentic indictment record, which was filed in court. Israeli attorneys don't dare to mention any perversion of records and process, or fraud by judges, since it may lead to sanctions against their license.
The fraud in Supreme Court and District Court records in Moti Leybel's case follows the pattern shown in Supreme Court and District Court records in the cases of whistle-blower Shuki Mishol [ii] and Roman Zadorov -- the Israeli Mendel Beilis. [iii] Such cases of blatant fraud by justices of the Supreme Court are particularly despicable, since they all pertain to Liberty. Such conduct has become a routine at the same period that the Israeli Supreme Court has launched a "Constitutional Revolution", purportedly based on "Human Dignity and Liberty". In retrospect, the "Constitutional Revolution" should be deemed hifalutin PR campaign, led by then Supreme Court Presiding Justice Aharon Barak. [iv]
Conduct of the Israeli courts should be deemed blatant violation of the right for Fair and Public Hearing in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the right for Due Process in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Both in Israel and in the US, there is no substitute for public observers of the courts to safeguard against judicial corruption.
Figure. Public Court Observers -- part of the Israeli social protest movement.
LINKS
i 2016-06-20 US DHS assists in suppression of anti-corruption dissent in Israel , OpEdNews.com
2017-03-10 Israeli Police Arrest Child Welfare Activists, Attorneys, Charging Them with Terrorism and Sex Crimes, Tikun Olam
2017-03-18 [Video] The remedy for Israeli judicial corruption is repression of social protest , OpEdNews.com
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Video-The-remedy-for-Isr-by-Joseph-Zernik-Children-170317-666.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).