Jim Turner, 2006:
"Aspartame/NutraSweet cripples the lives of thousands of people. When I tried to persuade the President of the Searle Drug company, manufactures of that chemical sweetener, to do the tests that would find any dangers it posed before It was marketed he blew me off. His name was Donald Rumsfeld (Iraq war architect). In exchanges about aspartame safety with him and his company, I learned how little he values human life."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Jim Turner, 2005:
Delaney covers cancer in both man and animals. The Delaney clause in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) provides that no additive including pesticides may be approved in processed food if it has been found to induce cancer in man or animals. EPA regulates pesticide residues in food under FFDCA and has interpreted the Delaney clause as subject to an exception for carcinogenic pesticides that pose only a negligible risk. This interpretation was adopted in 1988 upon the recommendation of the National Academy of Sciences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Summarized rom a superb article in Farm Land Birds by Hunter Lewis:
Monsanto's Friends in High Places - The remarkable revolving door career of Michael Taylor at the FDA and Monsanto
Many corporations send an employee into a government agency to influence regulation.
How much better if the employee can actually shape government regulation to promote and sell a specific product! Monsanto seems to have accomplished this -- and much more. Michael Taylor is among a number of people with Monsanto ties who have worked in government in recent years. He worked for the Reagan Food and Drug Administration in the 1970s, then became a lawyer representing Monsanto. In 1991, he returned to the FDA as Deputy Commissioner for Policy under George H. W. Bush, and helped secure approval for Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine (cow) growth hormone, despite it being banned in Canada, Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.
This was only a start for Taylor. He really did not like some producers advertising their milk as bovine-growth-hormone-free, thus putting Monsanto's product in an unfavorable light. Thus, in 1994 he wrote a guidance document from within the FDA requiring that any food label describing the product as bovine-growth-hormone-free must also include these words: "The FDA has determined ... no significant difference has been shown between milk derived from [BGH] and non-[BGH] supplemented cows." It did not bother Taylor one whit that this new pronouncement by the FDA was unsupported by either Monsanto or FDA studies. A private company making any such unsupported claim could have been charged with fraud. But because it came out of the FDA, milk producers would place themselves at legal risk by not printing it on their label.Taylor then moved to the US Department of Agriculture in the mid-1990s, and he attempted to persuade the FDA and Federal Trade Commission to take a further step and make it illegal for dairies to make any claim to a bovine-growth-hormone-free product. This failed, so he reached out to state governments to make such a claim illegal at the state level. This was finally blocked by a court decision in Ohio that there was indeed a "compositional difference" between BGH and non-BGH-treated milk.
However, long before that 2010 ruling, Taylor had returned to Monsanto as a vice president, and then returned to President Obama's FDA, first as Senior Advisor on Food Safety and then Deputy Commissioner for Foods.
Taylor's story, however, is not just about milk, or even mainly about milk. During his second posting at the FDA, as Deputy Commissioner for Policy 1991--1994, Agency scientists were grappling with questions about the overall safety of genetically engineered foods (often labeled Genetically Modified Organisms). As Jeffrey Smith notes,
[Internal] memo after memo described toxins, new diseases, nutritional deficiencies, and hard to detect allergens. [Staff scientists] were adamant that the technology carried "serious health hazards," and required careful, long-term research, including human studies.
The Agency, under Taylor's and later under others' leadership, simply ignored these findings. No human studies were required. GMO foods were allowed to enter the food supply unregulated by the FDA and barely regulated by the USDA, which views them as an important US export product. By 2012, in the US, 90 percent of sugar beets (representing half of overall sugar production) was GMO, 85 percent of soybeans (which are to be found in 70 percent of all supermarket food products), and 85 percent of corn, including the corn used to make high fructose corn syrup, a sweetener used in most soft drinks and processed foods.
The few scientists trying to conduct independent research on GMO found their careers damaged. Most food research, conferences, and fellowships are funded by "Big Food" companies including Monsanto, with obviously a very negative and chilling effect. Even sympathetic colleagues may be reluctant to back those who dare speak out.
Those who persevered in conducting independent research, often abroad, reported worrisome findings. An Austrian study found that mice fed GMO corn seemed fine in the first and second generations, but by the third were sterile. A Russian study of hamsters fed GMO soybeans found a similar result.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
2
1
1
