Special Note: This essay is an edited version of the well researched document available at http://pledgeforamerica.com/2.html. For a collection of reliable, verifiable information suggesting that 9/11 may have been a form of false flag operation, please see the 9/11 Information Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/911information. The following article was referenced as a footnote in David Ray Griffin's book entitled 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out. (Footnote 46 of Chapter 1, listed on page 205 --See 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Griffin, David Ray and Scott, Peter Dale, Eds., Olive Branch Press, Northampton, Mass., 2007.)
The footnote reads:
46. "Baosteel Will Recycle world Trade Center Debris," Eastday.com, 24 January 2002 (www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm).
"The third fact supporting the theory of controlled demolition is evidence of a deliberate cover-up. If the buildings' steel beams and columns had indeed been sliced by explosives, and examination of the steel would have revealed this fact. In this case, however, most of the steel was quickly hauled away, before it could be examined, then put on ships to Asia, where it would be melted down..."
The sentence that immediately follows is apropos, to say the least:
"Although it is normally a federal offense to remove evidence from a crime scene, the removal of the steel, which was carefully overseen, was facilitated by federal officials."
Why was the steel immediately removed? Dr. Griffin concludes that this is evidence of a deliberate cover-up I would agree. This latter quotation references another footnote. (See page 11, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Griffin, David Ray and Scott, Peter Dale, Eds., Olive Branch Press, Northampton, Mass., 2007.)
Let's not forget that it was an exposure of a cover-up that brought Nixon down.
As mentioned elsewhere in Dr. Griffin's book by Dr. Steven E Jones, there was "molten steel" found at the base of the World Trade Center as many as 21 days after the attack (See page 34 above.)
According to a blogger, 'Both BYU and Prof. Jones have been offered additional grants if he would "change the direction" of his research. In addition, there have been threats made by an individual who "is taking action" to stop Steven Jones' research, specifically his experiment with thermites (aluminothermics), on the grounds his work may be helpful to "terrorists". Jones notes that much more detailed information on both thermite and thermate is readily available on the internet.' http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=491981
As detailed in Dr Griffin's book mentioned above, the 47 steel beams at the core of each of the Twin Towers were "sliced" into sections that could be conveniently loaded into trucks and hauled away. The explosive agents that are identified by the authors in the book that are capable of "slicing steel" are RDX, thermite, and thermate. The type of explosions that would have had to have occurred are known as "cutter charges." Such explosions were reported to have been seen coming from the Twin Towers on September 11.
What chemical or physical process could have produced molten steel that would have been found at the base of the World Trade Center as many as 21 days ater the attack? What is certain is that a petrochemical fire caused by the cumbustion of airplane fuel would NOT have caused this. The presence of molten steel raises other questions. Was the steel radioactive?
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGkmQKi.RGrhYAr0xXNyoA?p=RDX+radioactive+residue&y=Search&fr=yfp-t-501
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?&artid=348896
The World Trade Center was not only struck by airplanes on September 11th, --it was also nuked!
If the presence of molten steel 21 days after the 9/11 attacks is proof of a radioactive explosion, then both the molten steel found at the base of the World Trade Center during clean-up, AND the steel that was shipped off to China, were both likely radioactivley charged. Anyone who came in contact with the already cut steel beams from the cores of each of the Twin Towers would have been exposed to harmful levels of radioactivity. Further, it is also likely that the steel debris that was sold to the Chinese steel refabricator mentioned in the article below was sold without informing the buyer of the steel's radioactive charge.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
