Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/31/13

Regarding Occupy McDonald's wage-increase demand

By       (Page 3 of 8 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 79723
Message Don Mashak

Now it would be easy to jump into that false left/right two-party-dogma paradigm and declare US business (for our purposes McDonald's) the bad guys and McDonald's employees as the victims, and proceed to vote in the next election accordingly. But is McDonald's really the consummate bad guy in this free-market play?

While this writer is not going to try to place the mantle of sainthood upon the founders, owners, managers, and shareholders of McDonald's neither does this writer believe these just-identified folks bear the majority of the responsibility for the declining standard of living of McDonald's hourly wage employees.

Let us begin with this empirical observation and fundamental premise:

All Value Comes From Labor!

If the hole isn't dug, the bricks aren't laid, the plumbing isn't plumbed, the wiring isn't installed, the wheat is not sown, the cows are not fed, the product is not delivered, the burgers are not fried, and the fries are not salted; the founders, owners, and shareholders of McDonald's have nothing and get nothing. It is that simple. All value comes from labor.

In our society, the US dollar is the form and measure of value. And McDonald's founders, owners, and shareholders use the value they receive in the form of dollars to pay their employees, pay their vendors, pay their taxes, and what is left over is theirs to keep.

In a true free-market system, the founders, owners, shareholders, and investors in McDonald's are entitled to their profit. Why? Because they hazarded the risk of beginning the business, they are entitled to the reward. While McDonald's is now clearly profitable, when first founded it could have just as likely failed as succeeded. Before the age of dubious bank bailouts, in the event of financial failure the founders of McDonald's (any business) would have lost their investment in time and money, period.

The reward of profit is the incentive for entrepreneurs to take risks. And those that hazard the risk are entitled to the rewards of success. [For those of you who refuse to free yourselves from the false left/right two-party dogma and believe the founders of McDonald's are not entitled to their profit this writer puts the following to you--"How happy would you be if you did not have a job because the founders of McDonald's never hazarded the risk of starting the McDonald's franchise?"]

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Don Mashak Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Born, raised on dairy farm in Wisconsin, survived public education, graduated UOFMN, matriculating in life

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Regarding Occupy McDonald's wage-increase demand

Correcting THE VIEW's perspective of reality (& Obama's Press Conference)