Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 28 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Pandering Destroys Purpose

By       (Page 3 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
Author 80363
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Eric Lucas
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

In the primary, David Simpson lost.   In an Everett Herald interview on September 15, 2004 his opponent Sells said,   "I'm certain it had an impact-People look at candidates' credibility and make judgments based on that."


Pandering and Total Contradiction


Clearly, the "credibility" problem flows from "the contradiction" of trying to advocate for opposite positions at the same time.


Make no mistake, THIS IS THE ESSENTIAL HAZARD OF PANDERING.   When a politician tells whatever group he is in front of what they want to hear in order to gain their support, sooner or later he will contradict himself.   It is inevitable.   Pure pandering represents a reckless disregard of existing facts.  You are allowed to "diminish" unfavorable facts but you are not allowed to eliminate them.


This is why every politician is coached to "stay on message."   Unlike pandering, message is purpose.   "Message" represents the argument that the candidate is advocating.   If we are fortunate it also represents the candidates vision for the public.    


Pure pandering destroys purpose in the head-on collision of contradiction.  


Purpose is essential to meaning.   When we say what we mean our words have clarity and focus.    We instinctively believe that those who say what they mean will manifest their words in action.


Occasionally, time may allow a person to be for a cause and then later against a cause.   But, as Mr. Simpson learned, unless your pandering remains undetected, it is impossible to be in favor of opposite purposes at the same time without destroying the inherent meaning and credibility of both positions.  


Pure pandering generates meaninglessness.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Must Read 2   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Eric Lucas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Eric Z. Lucas is an alumnus of Stanford University (Creative Writing Major: 1972-1975), the University of Washington (1981: BA English Literature and Elementary Education) and Harvard Law School, J.D. 1986. Since law school he has been a public (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Lives Matter: The Problem of Citizenship

Create the Compassionate Society

Black Lives Matter: Voting Rights Are Not Enough

The Power of Sincerity

Redefining Citizenship Can End the War on Drugs

Demonization and Political Rhetoric

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: