Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

No Letup in Western-Backed Syrian Violence

By       (Page 3 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 194
Message Stephen Lendman
Become a Fan
  (193 fans)

"What is more, they also realized that the PKK's support of the violent regime in Syria puts all Kurds in the region in an awkward position. They do not want Kurds to be seen as supporting a brutal regime that has been cracking down on civilian protestors."

Unexplained was why Assad would risk further alienating Turkey, especially when he's pre-occupied against heavily armed Western-backed insurgents. The last thing he wants is Ankara's more direct involvement. Doing so might turn the tide against him. He's no fool and wouldn't risk it.

In 1998, Turkey and Syria nearly clashed. As a result, Assad distanced himself from PKK elements to prevent war erupting. Why risk it now? Moreover, Syria's Kurdish area's been peaceful since he granted hundreds of thousands there citizenship.

However, Today's Zaman claimed "Turkish intelligence reports submitted to the government detailed how the Assad regime has been providing support to the PKK in Syria by giving them freedom to operate in the northern part of the country bordering Turkey."

It added that doing so provides a buffer zone against possible Turkish intervention in Syria, either alone or as part of NATO. Again, antagonizing Ankara hardly seems a sound way to do it.

On March 24, Reuters headlined, "Syrian tanks enter northern town, Homs pounded again," saying:

"Ignoring a U.N. Security Council call for an end to hostilities, President Bashar al-Assad's forces clashed with rebel fighters and bombarded several towns and cities, aiming to crush a year-long uprising against the government."

Killer gang violence is ignored. Assad confronting it responsibly is called "ignoring" a UN mandate. What's about his people's safety. As head of state, he's obligated to protect them.

Months of violence took thousands of lives. More die daily. Assad's blamed for killer gang deaths and atrocities. Washington's war on him rages. So do scoundrel media backing regime change.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7


Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Lendman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert