Today, it appears that even the neocon editors of the Washington Post have been forced to accept this important distinction, grudging as that acknowledgement may have been. The New York Times, however, has simply inserted the new weasel word, "capability," which could mean almost anything and which still misleads readers.
To its credit, perhaps, the Times did include another relevant fact near the end of its Wednesday article, noting that Israel is "a nuclear weapons state." That's a key fact in understanding why Iran might want a nuclear deterrent but is rarely cited by the Times in its background on the current crisis.
For further context, the Times also might want to add that Israel's nuclear arsenal remains undeclared and that Israel -- unlike Iran -- has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or to allow international inspectors into Israeli nuclear facilities. But such balance may be simply too much to expect from the Times.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).