Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 4 Share on Facebook 7 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 2 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend 4 (19 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   9 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

How Wall Street Was Able to Profit from Trashing America's Mainstreet Economy

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark     Permalink
      (Page 3 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 3   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 2/26/12

Author 8235
Become a Fan
  (110 fans)

A good many true believers think "capitalism" and "America" are synonymous.   What makes the Tea Party so powerful is that it also appears to be an uprising against capitalism, against Wall Street -- in particular against the bailouts.   For example, Tea Party protesters often talk about how much they hate "crony capitalism."   It's only when you really dig down that you discover that their understanding of "what went wrong" in the housing bubble and the financial crisis is that government played too large a role in the economy, not too small a role.   And their crazy idea for getting revenge on "crony capitalism" is to cut red tape and get regulators out of the picture altogether.   A perfect example of this is Newt Gingrich's Super PAC's TV commercials against Romney and Bain Capital:   The ad's narrator is all for "capitalism," but oh how he hates what Bain Capital has done to working people's lives!   (But Newt's solution would be further deregulation!)

[Watch this very slick million-dollar video   (paid for by Newt's sugar daddy) that utterly destroys the credibility and alleged integrity of Mitt Romney and the doings of his predatory, leveraged-capital buyout operation, Bain Capital and other such enterprises.]  

 

In his book, Frank says that the right wing and their media shills suffer from a "victim complex."    But how is this possible?   (How to understand books such as "The Persecution of Sarah Palin"?)

 

That they do indeed understand themselves as victims is undeniable.   It is Sarah Palin's entire raison d'etre.   Whenever one sees her face TV, one knows that very soon someone is going to make the point that someone, somewhere was mean to her.   This is also what explains the whole fantasy of concentration camps for conservatives, which continues on in places.   [See  this link, for example].  

  

 

Not surprisingly, perhaps, this ties in with the absurd theme that runs throughout "Atlas Shrugged," where the main character, who has organized a strike of the billionaire class, describes himself as "the defender of the oppressed, the disinherited, the exploited," by which, quite incredibly, he refers to his fellow billionaires!     That's right, in one of the most popular novels in recent history, billionaires are said to be -- insisted to be! -- the "disinherited" and "exploited" class.   And millions of college sophomores and others who came to be of like mind have gobbled this up!

 

How can conservatives keep this down, once they've gobbled it up?   The explanation is that they merely understand "elitism" in a different way than you and I.   In their deluded way of thinking, the true "powers' of society are not the rich, but the professionally-credentialed and the government-connected.   Conservatives basically invert the populist categories of yore:   Instead of blue-collar workers or farmers being the exploited producer class, it is entrepreneurs.   Why?   Because it's they who have to work so hard and have to comply with regulations and pay taxes and put up with the whining of their tattooed hipster employees.   And so to their way of thinking it is the rest of us who are the real parasite class.  

 

Ironically, utopian capitalism is, in all sorts of ways, a delusion that runs parallel to utopian communism.  

 

It's not a coincidence that both movements, utopian capitalism and utopian communism, had their heyday as responses to systemic economic breakdowns, and that both of them have spawned similar social movements, in which the gleam of the utopia is so blinding that it cancels out all sorts of realities that are obvious to everyone else (famine in the Ukraine;   the role of toxic credit default swaps in the US).   There are dozens of other curious parallels, all of them drawn out in shocking detail in Frank's book.

 

The Obama presidency was the time for a second FDR, not Clinton II.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 3   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?