* Why was it handled in an unlawful fashion?
* Who caused it to be handled in an unlawful fashion?
* How did certain individuals benefit from it being handled in an unlawful fashion?
* How many federal and state laws were violated in the process?
* How many individuals would wind up in orange jump suits if actions related to Rollins v. Rollins were investigated fully?
I am seeking answers to those questions, and that process seems to make Mr. Rollins uncomfortable. The observant reader might ask this questions: If the Rollins divorce case was handled lawfully, why are Mr. Rollins and his lawyer concerned about my reporting--which is based on documents that come straight from the court file?
We soon will address some of the issues Team Rollins raises in an effort to muddy the waters--on a case where the waters are crystal clear. But first, let's present my response to Chad Essick's second letter. Suffice to say, Mr. Essick fails to show that there is anything inaccurate or misleading about my reporting:
Mr. Essick:
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).