(What the f*** is he saying?!?!?!)
JUDGE: With a written notice of settlement filed by plaintiffs counsel
(??? Haven’t been able to find a copy of this yet. . . )
JUDGE: Then the court vacates trial date. At this time parties have a time to show cause why it should not be dismissed.
JUDGE: This came so close on the heels there is no written settlement so I’m asking that plaintiffs’ counsel when I read their names stand and tell me if indeed it’s the fact -- there is a stm agreement it’s settled and you wish the trial date to be vacated.
Eight cases to read by name.
PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY VENUS SOLTAN says she wants the payment to be in 60 days
She represents 50 people and has not seen the memo of understanding
BOUCHER says the soonest practical and possible is December 1
PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY JOHN MANLY: I think we have an agreement is what we're trying to say to put on record. We haven’t seen the memorandum. We can agree to vacate the trial date
MANLY: I’ll look at the agreement and if there’s anything I don't want in there I’ll let the court know.
JUDGE: This is D Day we're either vacating trial date or going to trial.
JUDGE: We need to set a date for dismissal of Hagenbach normally 45 days
BOUCHER: Can we set a court hearing? The document hasn’t been -- San Diego’s bankruptcy is still a consideration. I’ll consult with Mr. Hennigan re a date…
JUDGE: I’d like to get written notice from liaison counsel that renders an account of all the names -- All defendants and any remaining defendants case by case.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
