I'm going to offer you a red pill. Just a small demo. You can choose to take another later or resume your somnolescence with a blue pill. Our journey starts in Queensland, Australia where the people are struggling to maintain an uncontaminated water supply. They are fighting to not have to drink water that has been recycled from sewage. They are also struggling to avoid fluoridation of the water supply even though research now supports their position. Queenslanders seek to assert their rights to have clean, safe water to drink. A group in Queensland is pressing a class action suit against the government of Queensland, demanding municipal water supplies not be fluoridated
"Take the red pill, you will stay in wonderland, and I will show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember, what I am offering is the truth, nothing more. Follow me."
However, justice in the Courts of Australia is a sham. Whether bringing any matter to a Planning and Environment Court, Magistrates Court, District Court, or Supreme Court their procedures can invalidate any hope of a just action by a simple signal: the stamp required by the Parliament. Two different court seals are used. The seal on the lawyers' certificate of practice which allow them to practice in that venue is likely different from the seal that is used on the contentious documents they present in that venue. If the action sought is opposite government policy, it will be pre-judged and the documents affixed with a stamp that signal the pre-judgment.
If the solicitor should object, his or her career could be at risk. He or she will argue the case knowing full well that no matter how much money is thrown at pressing such an issue, it has already been decided. But they will not mention that there is nothing they can do to win the case.
A false Seal of the Supreme Court of Queensland can be substituted for the authentic seal and a stamp used to indicate that the court that will sit in judgment is technically NOT a statutory court. Only the false seal and the stamp that signifies a prior ruling is required to shift even the Supreme Court to sitting as a non-statutory body. It all looks the same. The Supreme Court Justices are sitting on the bench in judgment. Arguments are made in the usual manner. But the end result has been pre-determined by government policy.
My Queensland source reports,
This charade was discovered about three years ago and some questions were asked in Parliament and various people wrote to other members of Parliament but the answers being given are as dishonest as one would expect and nothing has changed except that this same issue in the Federal Court has now been argued in the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney with some positive results so far but a decision is being made in the coming weeks from a hearing held on Tuesday last week.This is the alternative dispute resolution procedure that is not bound by the rule of law. Decisions are only made in accordance with party policy of the ruling political party. So one could assume that, if it's the Labour party policy to add fluoride to the municipal water supply, the so-called court will not change this policy no matter how brilliant the argumentation and citation of legal principle ... or how much money you throw at this issue.
This scam has been around for many, many years and concealed by our elected members of the Parliament who are also members of the Legal Profession. The other non-legal members of the Parliament just do as they are advised by their legal advisers as they have no or very little knowledge of any of the legal issues only knowledge of how to be a member of a political party and how to get elected.
Decisions from this alternative process are also final but if you have deep pockets they will take the money and conduct another sham hearing in the pretend court of appeal and give you another very technical legal argument and reasons for the decision. They are experts at this and have had plenty of practice over the years of keeping all of us peasants in line.
A similar, but effective sham has been in place in the United States for a similar period. Here in the States "authorities" use a flag with a fringe and a golden eagle perched atop the staff. This signifies an Admiralty Court in which Maritime Jurisprudence is administered in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code. Principles of the Common Law under which your nation was founded are no longer used unless demanded by the wary litigant. To understand how this happened you must study the HISTORY OF COMMERCE in A New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles.