RT" @RT_comAleppo & Mosul: How Western rhetoric on anti-terror ops changes depending on location (VIDEO) http:// on.rt.com/7sow
Aleppo & Mosul: How Western rhetoric on anti-terror ops changes depending on location (VIDEO) -- RT...
Despite the two Middle Eastern cities' similar plights, with both of the densely populated areas caught in war with terrorism, Western officials' position on active anti-terror campaigns is apparen... rt.com
RT: The US has been highly critical of the Russian anti-terrorist offensive on Aleppo in Syria. How is that any different to the US-led operation in Mosul?
RM: Well, Mosul is going to be worse. What we had in East Aleppo was a situation where a ceasefire had been worked out. What happened, of course, was the United States Air Force, in its own wisdom, bombed fixed Syrian Army positions -- army positions that had been there for six months. They said it was a "mistake." Yet the whole ceasefire fell apart and what happened next, of course, was that nobody got out of Aleppo without great danger, and it was impossible to resupply Aleppo with the crucial things they need. There are crocodile tears being shed about what happened in East Aleppo. No one likes destruction and killing, but this could have been avoided had the US Air Force decided to obey the Commander-in-Chief and not attack Syrian Army forces.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
2
2
2
