Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

What China Daily Newspaper Has Been Saying Re Liu Xiaobo's Nobel Prize

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jay Janson     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 12/12/10

Author 1723
Become a Fan
  (49 fans)
- Advertisement -
Liu was arrested in January 1991 on the charge of disseminating reactionary information. But because he "sincerely confessed" to his guilt and prayed for leniency, he was not given a criminal sentence. Instead, he was sentenced to three-year "labor education" in September 1996 on charges of "disturbance to social order".

Liu's reactionary remarks posted on the Internet, which many others supported and signed, are beyond the scope of freedom of speech. Liu was sentenced for his repeated violations of the country's criminal laws, and not, unlike what some Western media say, only for offending the government by publishing some "critical opinions".

- Advertisement -
Laws and international conventions differ in forms and interpretations from country to country. Every country has set its own limits on "freedom of speech".

The United States code says that people who advocate revolts and violence against federal or local authorities will be subjected to criminal punishment. In the United Kingdom, dissemination of remarks or intentions aimed at overthrowing the Queen is regarded as violation of the law. In Italy, any attack against the country's administrative and judicial organs is considered a crime. Germany, Canada, Australia and Singapore have similar regulations or stipulations.

Facts show that the so-called freedom of speech that the US guarantees its citizens is based on the precondition that their remarks do not constitute a threat to the country's political system and/or social stability.

Because of different cultural backgrounds, social conditions and legal systems, each country has adopted standards of freedom of speech that are different from others but conform to its judicial practices.
In the US and the UK, for instance, "the clear and present danger test" is taken as a standard for judges to pass a verdict on suspected violators of freedom of speech. Neither the US nor any other country grants freedom to its people to say and do whatever they want to because that would lead to anarchy. And anarchy is the last thing China, or any country, wants.

- Advertisement -
Nobel Peace Prize not international community voice
By Guo Jisi, China Daily , 11/1/10
click here

Historically, the Committee has awarded the Peace Prize to Andrey Dmitriyevich Sakharov, Mikhail Gorbachev and even the Dalai Lama, the logic behind the selection of recipients is clear: those who try hard to split or oppose a Communist country or cater to the West's agenda will be selected.
Nobel decision motivated by Cold War thinking
By Ji Shiping, China Daily
Updated: 2010-10-30 07:01
click here

Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjorn Jagland recently published a signed article entitled "Why We Gave Liu Xiaobo a Nobel" in the New York Times.

Jagland said, "China should be proud that it has become powerful enough to be the subject of debate and criticism."

Prize as political tool
Since Jagland took the chairmanship, the Nobel Committee has selected two controversial winners for the peace prize in two consecutive years.

Last year, the Nobel Committee decided to award the peace prize to the president of the United States, a country that was fighting two wars at the time. After the decision was announced, the opposition parties within the Norwegian parliament asked Jagland to resign from the Nobel Committee because he was also serving as secretary-general of the Council of Europe.

Nobel prize has nothing to do with peace
China Daily , 10/24/10
click here

- Advertisement -
Liu Xiaobo and Nobel Peace Prize are both farce, china daily, 10/23/10
click here

According to Sir Alfred Nobel's will the Peace Prize is to be granted to the person "who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congress".  What contributions along those line Liu has made to deserve the prize? Many Chinese still remember his remarks that"China needs to be colonized for 300 years." ...

The Democratic China magazine sponsored by NET "coincidentally" chaired by Liu Xiaobo. Until now, Liu can get 13,000 yuan in prison for his job in that magazine. His boss is really kind to him! 
Liu Xiaobo and some other guys like him thought since they are backed up by their western boss, so they can swagger around in China. Those so called intellectuals with a strong political speculative thought are not rare cases in China. However, more and more Chinese have felt disgusted about those guys for their ugly moves of flattering their western bosses to get money.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Jay Janson is an archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer; has lived and worked on all continents; articles on media published in China, Italy, UK, India and the US; now resides in NYC; First effort was a series of (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Tony Bennett Said About 9/11 Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Also

Girlfriends? Petraeus Oversaw the Slaughter of Thousands and He Will Face Trial:

Demonic David Rockefeller Fiends Dulles Kissinger Brzezinski - Investor Wars Korea thru Syria

U.S. Threat to Atom Bomb North Korea Never Forgotten

So How Many Poor Vietnamese Did McCain's Bombs Kill in 23 Runs?