103 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 19 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/5/16

WHATCOM COUNTY, Washington: VOTING AND VOTE-COUNTING, with INTEGRITY!

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Message Marian Beddill


SECURITY of the COMPUTERS:

Ah! The processing!

The computer system is located in a locked and secure room. There are industrial quality, high-speed scanners, which make and save a digital copy of the votes that were marked on the paper ballot by the voter. They are directly connected to the processing computers, and take only seconds to read a batch.

At predetermined and announced times, so that observers may be present, the ballots in batches are 'read' into the computer system by a high-speed scanner, one batch at a time. The batch numbers are registered on the log sheets of each scanner.


The Scanner
The Scanner
(Image by Whatcom County Auditor)
  Details   DMCA

The scanner.

One big safeguard is that the scanners and computers which read the marks on the ballots, and store and count the votes, have NO communication-connections to the outside world. Programs are loaded onto the computers from certified copies on digital media. Data cannot be sent directly to or from these computers and any others. The computers have features which would block any attempt to send/receive thru the electric power lines.

All vote-total digital output from those computers is transferred out ONLY by manual transport of a removable external disc drive. The data is copied onto such a disc, which is carried (by two people, for integrity) to an administrative room to be incorporated into the permanent storage systems. (We call that a "sneaker-net", referring to their shoes.) For verification, those vote totals are also printed in both locations (the computer room before they go out, and again in the administrative office, so there can be a double-check.) Then the results will be made ready to go public. BUT! There is another step!

AUDITS and OBSERVERS:

The computerized results are subjected to a wonderful activity - a manual double-check - a mini-audit.

One major activity which the Observers do, is randomly selecting batches for integrity verification. While the paper-ballot batches are being scan-read by the computer systems, the Observers in that room have been granted the role of designating some random batches to be later verified by a hand-count. Those batches are then sealed in special boxes, tagged, registered, and stored in a separate place.

The double-check hand-count takes place soon afterwards (usually the next morning.) Those randomly-selected batches of paper ballots are taken to a meeting-room, and any Observers may be present. The Staff opens the paper ballot boxes, and hand-count the selected races (twice, by two teams of staffers.) If those two counts agree, then the computerized counts (which were printed but not disclosed) are announced for the first time, and everybody knows whether the computer-counts numbers match the hand-counts -- or are different! It is an independent, basic double-check!

If the vote-tally numbers differ between the computer-count and the hand-count, then an investigation is started (right there, in the same room!) The paper ballots are then intensely scrutinized for any irregularity which might have been understood one way by the computer-system, and another way by the staff. The most common reason for a difference has been that a pen-mark by the voter on a paper ballot was lighter than recommended (required) -- which led the staff-people to see it as "A VOTE", but the more-sensitive computer-system to call it "a non-vote -- a blank". When the staff and managers find such a ballot, it will be removed from the batch and a substitute ballot sheet marked (duplicated) to coincide with the presumed Voter-Intent will be inserted. That "repaired" batch is then again run through the scanner/computer system, and the new results are brought to the review team (with Public Observers still there). With almost no exceptions, over about a dozen years, the computer tally with the vote properly marked, matched the hand count first found by the verify-staff. No errors, and no corruption.

The batches of paper ballots are then archived, under a management system of coded identification of each batch.

THE COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Interesting 2   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Marian Beddill Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marian Beddill -- Retired Engineer -- Citizen Activist -- Author UU - Environment - Justice - FairVoting - Political - Communications - Individual Freedom of Belief - Unitarian Universalist. Political Action and Issues Be (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

WHATCOM COUNTY, Washington: VOTING AND VOTE-COUNTING, with INTEGRITY!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend