Hence if there was some hypothetical fiend (Auric Goldfinger?), who wanted to subtly manipulate voters, would find it efficient, economical, and effective to use a generic pundit who worked on listeners all over the country on a basic level such as inciting jealousy. It would be easier to hire one guy to magically (like the miracle of the loaves and fishes) appear on a multitude of local radio stations around the country and tell all of his listeners that the unions were exploiting them as taxpayers. If a gullible audience became convinced that something unfair was afoot, then it would be easy to push them further and put it in more graphic terms: "The unions are stealing from your tax dollar." All people in the Congressional Districts across the three time zones could be urged to call their Congressional representative and urge them to put a "stop to this robbery."
If the hypothetical bad guy, Goldfinger, with ulterior motives, and the imaginary ubiquitous voice from the radio were able to bust unions so that Goldfinger could more easily reduce the pay of his workers and bank more money . . . oh well, caveat emptor should explain that bit of diabolical manipulation. Wouldn't it be uber-ironic if the voice was a union member decrying unions? Didn't your grandmother always say that "All's fair in love, war, and politics"?
Let's imagine the USA as an old West Saloon. (Skimpy's Bar in Kalgoorlie had the old fashioned double swinging doors when we were there in 2008. When was the last time you saw a tavern entrance like that in California?) Suppose someone plays cards in the saloon and suspects there has been some cheating going on to fleece the victim of all his cash. The sheriff asks you to tell him what happened and how it was done. He can't arrest a winner just because you lost. You complain to the Preacher and he says you shouldn't have been gambling in the first place. You complain to the editor of the Tombstone Epitaph (or whatever the daily paper is named) and the editor says: "When you have a choice of printing the truth or the legend, always go with the legend." America, you've been had and the general opinion in the corporate owned media is that you should "suck it up" like a man.
You've been fleeced of your money. No one wants to hear your sad lament. You should have known better before you sat down at the poker table, eh?
The streets are filling up with homeless people asking for donations. Jobs are getting very scarce. Banks just make too much money from foreclosures so stopping them from doing more just doesn't make sense to them. Look into foreclosures more closely and you will see that they make excessive amounts of money by foreclosing and asking them to give up a big profit just isn't logical. If the home's owner stops making payments how can they make money on that? Did Houdini really make the elephant disappear? Check it out, slick, just "cause you don't know how to do it doesn't mean the trick can't be performed.
Why would conservative talk show hosts belong to a union and tell listeners that the political impasse in Wisconsin is the fault of unions? Check it out, slick, just "cause you can't explain it doesn't mean it ain't happening.
Folks in Los Angeles don't like the joke about how they are like a bowl of granola (it's full of nuts fruits and flakes). Folks in New York City don't like other people imitating a Brooklyn accent. People in flyover country (everything "down there" for people who do business in both L. A. and New York City) don't even like to hear their area referred to in that flip manner.
When a young man from Western Australia said he was from Perth, we asked if he ever went to hear rock music at Mojo's in Fremantle. When he realized that this columnist knows the subtle difference between those two cities (Fremantle is to Perth as the "bu (ie. Malibu) is to Los Angeles), he was happy to admit he was a Fremantle citizen.